Teacher Education through Integrated Dialogic and Simulation-Based Learning: A Comprehensive Approach to Interpersonal Interactions
Streszczenie w języku polskim
This paper reviews the SIM+VE project, an innovative approach integrating dialogic learning and simulation-based learning (SBL) in teacher education. Spanning six years, this review synthesises findings from student-student, teacher-student, and teacher-teacher interactions to create a supportive and effective learning environment using virtual exchange (VE) platforms. The project aims to improve knowledge acquisition, motivation, engagement, and higher-order thinking abilities, preparing future educators to transform learning spaces. Specifically, this paper addresses: (1) How the SIM+VE model has influenced pre-service teachers' development of professional identities, addressed in sections on Simulation-Based Learning and Metacognitive Growth Through Dissonance; and (2) How the SIM+VE project has contributed to creating inclusive learning environments and promoting democratic dialogue structures among pre-service teachers, evidenced in the Integrated Dialogic and Simulation-Based Learning and Design Principles for Effective Simulations in Teacher Education sections. The review examines how SIM+VE has reshaped pre-service teachers' professional identities, promoted inclusive learning environments, and improved educational outcomes.
Słowa kluczowe
Pełny tekst:
PDF (English)Bibliografia
Alexander, R. (2020). A dialogic teaching companion. Routledge
Angelini, M. L., & Muñiz, R. (2021). Simulation through virtual exchange in teacher training. Edutec, Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, (75), 65-89.
Angelini, M. L., & Muñiz, R. (2023). Simulation for participatory education. Springer.
Angelini, M. L. (2023). A Case Study of Simulation Design in a Postgraduate Teacher Training Course. In Simulation for Participatory Education: Virtual Exchange and Worldwide Collaboration (pp. 283-298). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Angelini, M. L. (2024). Simulation-Based Training for Enhancing Professional Competencies in Teacher Education: A Study on the Role of Dissonant Profiles in Fostering Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills. Prima Educatione, 8(1), 87-100.
Carrera, A. M., Naweed, A., Leigh, E., Crea, T., Krynski, B., Heveldt, K., & Khetia, S. (2016). Constructing safe containers for effective learning: Vignettes of breakdown in psychological safety during simulated scenarios. In Intersections in Simulation and Gaming (pp. 15–29): Springer.
Dai, C. P. (2023). Enhancing learning achievements and self-efficacy for preservice teachers using model-based support in simulation-based learning with artificial intelligence-powered virtual agents. The Florida State University.
de Wijse-van Heeswijk, M. (2021). Ethics and the simulation facilitator: Taking your professional role seriously. Simulation & Gaming, 52(3), 312-332.
Dieckmann, P. (2020). The unexpected and the non-fitting – considering the edges of simulation as social practice. Advances in simulation (London, England), 5, 2. doi:10.1186/s41077- 020-0120.
Feldman, M. (1995). Import/export e-mail business simulation. Virtual connections: Online activities and projects for networking language learners, 216-217.
Hollins, E. R. (2015). Rethinking Field Experiences in Pre-service Teacher Preparation. Routledge.
Jones, K. (2013). Simulations: A Handbook for Teachers and Trainers. Routledge.
Kasperski, R., Levin, O., & Hemi, M. E. (2025). Systematic Literature Review of Simulation-Based Learning for Developing Teacher SEL. Education Sciences, 15(2), 129.
Kato, F. (2010). How We Think and Talk About Facilitation. Simulation & Gaming, 41(5), 694–704
Kriz, W. C. (2010). A Systemic-Constructivist Approach to the Facilitation and Debriefing of Simulations and Games. Simulation & Gaming, 41(5), 663–680. doi:10.1177/104687810831986.
Kriz, W. C. (2017). Types of gaming simulation applications. Simulation & Gaming, 48(1), 3-7.
Kriz, W. C. (2020). Gaming in the Time of COVID-19. Simulation & Gaming, 51(4), 403-410.
Levin, O. (2024). Simulation as a pedagogical model for deep learning in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 143, 104571.
Levin, O., Frei-Landau, R., Flavian, H., & Miller, E. C. (2025). Creating authenticity in simulation-based learning scenarios in teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 48(2), 291-312.
Muñiz, R., & Angelini, M. L. (2023). Virtual Exchange to Enhance Simulation Practice Across Borders. Pilot Project. In Simulation for participatory education: Virtual exchange and worldwide collaboration (pp. 349-359). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
O’Dowd, R., & Dooly, M. (2022). Exploring teachers’ professional development through participation in virtual exchange. ReCALL, 34(1), 21-36.
O'Dowd, R., & Vinagre, M. (2024). Virtual Innovation And Support Networks: Exploring the impact of Virtual Exchange in teacher education (p. 240). Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.
Pop, R. (2021). Pre-service Teachers’ Hands-on Experience with a Virtual Exchange and Simulation Project. An Introduction to Internet Linguistics, 81.
Riley, A. (2023). The Radical Relationality of Complex Partnerships: Community-Member Experiences in Critical Community-Based Learning (Doctoral dissertation, Portland State University).
Schiera, A. J. (2019). Justice, practice and the ‘Real World’: pre-service teachers’ critically conscious visions for teaching amid the complexities and challenges of learning to teach. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(7), 929-946.
Shirts, R. G. (1975). Notes on defining “Simulation”. Gaming-simulation: Rationale, design and applications. A text with parallel readings for social scientists, educators, and community workers. Wiley & Sons.
Simpson, A. (2018). Dialogic teaching in the initial teacher education classroom:“Everyone’s voice will be heard”. In Talking to Learn (pp. 89-106). Routledge.
Simpson, A., & Goodyear, P. (2022). Dialogic teaching and the architecture of hybrid learning spaces: Alexander meets Alexander. In Hybrid learning spaces (pp. 265-286). Springer International Publishing.
Teo, P. (2019). Teaching for the 21st century: A case for dialogic pedagogy. Learning, Culture and social interaction, 21, 170-178.
Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky. (Eds.). (2000). Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry. Cambridge University Press. 51-85.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/pe.2025.9.101-117
Data publikacji: 2025-12-31 15:37:04
Data złożenia artykułu: 2025-04-28 13:18:38
Statystyki
Wskaźniki
Odwołania zewnętrzne
- Brak odwołań zewnętrznych
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 MARÍA LAURA ANGELINI
Powyższa praca jest udostępniana na lcencji Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.