Willingness to pay for consumer food products in scientific research

Ewelina Sobotko

Abstract


Theoretical background: The basis for developing a company's pricing strategy is information on consumers' willingness to pay (WTP). In order to properly estimate the demand for the products offered, it is necessary to understand the reactions of consumers to different price levels of goods. Research on WTP has been developing dynamically in the international arena for over a decade. The concept of WTP as presented in the article, a concept which may support decisions concerning pricing policy and influence the earnings of entrepreneurs, is rarely discussed in Polish publications.

Purpose of the article: Based on the analysis of the literature, the article attempts to answer the question of whether, if buyers are willing to pay a higher price for certain characteristics of food products, WTP is an important predictor of consumers' purchase decisions.

Research methods: The article contains studies of Polish and world literature in the field of the development and application of WTP in the context of food consumer products.

Main findings: Consumers will most likely accept a higher price if they perceive that the value of a particular characteristic of the product distinguishes it from conventional goods. This means that it is not the price but the WTP that determines the decision to buy a food product. The relationship between value and price, and thus WTP, is crucial in the process of forecasting consumer choices.


Keywords


WTP; consumer decisions; economic value

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alphonce, R., & Alfnes, F. (2017). Eliciting consumer WTP for food characteristics in a developing context: Application of four valuation methods in an African market. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(1), 123–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12170.

Angulo, A.M., Gil, J.M., & Tamburo, L. (2005). food safety and consumers’ willingness to pay for labelled beef in Spain. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 11(3), 89–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J038v11n03_06.

Breidert, C. (2007). Estimation of Willingness-to-Pay: Theory, Measurement, Application. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.

Camron, T.A., & James, M.D. (1987). Estimating willingness to pay from survey data: An alternative pretest-market evaluation procedure. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(4).

De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00019.x.

Gil, J.M., Gracia, A., & Sanchez, M. (2000). Market segmentation and willingness to pay for organic products in Spain. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 3(2), 207–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7508(01)00040-4.

Giza, W. (2016). O ewolucji ekonomicznej teorii wartości. Studia Ekonomiczne, 259, 49–59.

Gleim, M., & Lawson, S.J. (2014). Spanning the gap: an examination of the factors leading to the green gap. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 31(6/7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-05-2014-0988.

Grunert, K.G. et al. (2009). Comparing methods for measuring consumer willingness to pay for a basic and an improved ready-made soup product. Food Quality and Preference, 20, 607–619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.07.006.

Kaczorowska, J., Rejman, K., & Halicka, E. (2018). Wpływ certyfikatu rolnictwa ekologicznego na gotowość konsumentów do zapłaty wyższej ceny za owoce. Handel Wewnętrzny, 3(374), 197–207.

Kalish, S., & Nelson, P. (1991). A comparison of ranking, rating and reservation price measurement in conjoint analysis. Marketing Letters, 2(4), 327–335.

Kalra, A., & Goodstein, R.C. (1998). The impact of advertising positioning strategies on consumer price sensitivity. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2), 210–224.

Kiesel, K., & Villas-Boas, S.B. (2007). Got organic milk? Consumer valuations of milk labels after the implementation of the USDA organic seal. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 5(1). DOI: 10.2202/1542-0485.1152.

Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2001). Principles of Marketing. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

Kowalczuk, I., & Maciąg, A. (2017). Wpływ poziomu cen i strategii cenowych na zachowania konsumentów na rynku żywności. Handel Wewnętrzny, 1(366), 203–215.

Kozłowski, W., Sobotko, E., & Rutkowska, A. (2018). Skłonność do płacenia za produkty społecznie odpowiedzialne i postrzeganie ich wartości – wpływ postaw i znaczenia sprawy społecznej. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio H – Oeconomia, 52(3), 73–81.

Krishna, A. (1991). Effect of dealing patters on consumer perceptions of deal frequency and willingness to pay. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 441–451.

Krystallis, A., Fotopoulos, C., & Zotos, Y. (2006). Organic consumers’ profie and their willingness to pay (WTP) for selected organic food products in Greece. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 19(1), 81–106. DOI: 10.1300/J046v19n01_05.

Lusk, J.L., Roosen, J., & Fox, J.A. (2003). Demand for beef from cattle administered growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn: A comparison of consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(1), 16–29.

Magnusson, M.K. et al. (2001). Attitudes towards organic foods among Swedish consumers. British Food Journal, 103(3), 209–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700110386755.

Miškolci, S. (2014). Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for the health aspects of food. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 59(4), 167–176. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159040167.

Mørkbak, M.R., & Nordström, J. (2009). The impact of information on consumer preferences for different animal food production methods. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32(4), 313–331.

Ogbeide, O.A. (2015). Consumer willingness to pay a premium for organic wine: discriminant analysis. Journal of Agribusiness, 1(1).

Olewnik-Mikołajewska, A. et al. (2016). Wpływ podwyższonej wartości odżywczej na skłonność do płacenia wyższej ceny za produkty pochodzenia zwierzęcego. Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie.

Ekonomika i Organizacja Gospodarki Żywnościowej, 114, 157–167.

Remaud, h. et al. (2008). Do Australian wine consumers value organic wine? 4th International Conference of the Academy of Wine Business Research, Siena 17–19 July.

Sajdakowska, M., Gutkowska, K., & Żakowska-Biemans, S. (2014). Skłonność konsumentów do płacenia wyższej ceny za innowacyjne produkty żywnościowe w kontekście metodologii WTP. Marketing i Rynek, 10, 27–32.

Stefani, G., Romano, D., & Cavicchi, A. (2006). Consumer expectations, liking and willingness to pay for specialty foods: Do sensory characteristics tell the whole story? Food Quality and Preference, 17(1–2), 53–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.07.010.

Stobbelaar, D.J. et al. (2007). Adolescents’ attitudes towards organic food: a survey of 15- to 16-year old school children. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(4), 349–356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00560.x.

Sundström, K., & Andersson, H. (2009). Swedish consumers’ willingness to pay for food safety: a contingent valuation study on salmonella risk. Working Papers 2009:2, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).

Varian, H.R. (2006). Mikroekonomia. Kurs średni. Ujęcie nowoczesne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Voelckner, F. (2006). An empirical comparison of methods for measuring consumers’ willingness to pay. Marketing Letters, 17(2), 137–149.

Wang, T., Venkatesh, R., & Chatterjee, R. (2007). Reservation price as a range: An incentive-compatible measurement approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2).

Wertenbroch, K., & Skiera, B. (2002). Measuring consumers’ willingness to pay at the point of purchase. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(2). DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.39.2.228.19086.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/h.2019.53.2.89-97
Date of publication: 2019-10-25 19:36:15
Date of submission: 2019-02-12 10:30:10


Statistics


Total abstract view - 1048
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Ewelina Sobotko

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.