The Foreign Language Effect and Decision Making: Potential Impact on Data Gathered on Crowdsourcing Platforms

Rafał Muda

Abstract


In this paper, issues connected with conducting research on crowdsourcing platforms which are specific types of research panels are described. The focus lays on advantages and disadvantages of mentioned platforms and revealing how to mitigate the impact of disadvantages on collected data. Moreover, the article depicts the influence of the foreign language effect (reduced presence of heuristic biases in the decision-making process when decision is made in the foreign language compared to the native language) on decision-making, which may be one of the threats connected with conducting experiments on crowdsourcing platforms. The last section is a description of author’s own study in domain of investment decisions. Results reveal that processing in a foreign language influences the decision. Namely, participants in a foreign language condition were not influenced by the status quo effect.


Keywords


foreign language effect; decision making; crowdsourcing

Full Text:

PDF (Język Polski)

References


Caldwell-Harris C.L., Ayçiçeği-Dinn A., Emotion and Lying in a Non-Native Language, “International Journal of Psychophysiology” 2009, No. 71, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.09.006.

Cipolletti H., McFarlane S., Weissglass C., The Moral Foreign-Language Effect, “Philosophical Psychology” 2015, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2014.993063.

Costa A., Foucart A., Arnon I., Aparici M., Apesteguia J., “Piensa” Twice: On the Foreign Language Effect in Decision Making, “Cognition” 2014a, No. 130, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.010.

Costa A., Foucart A., Hayakawa S., Aparici M., Apesteguia J., Heafner J., Your Morals Depend on Language, “PLoS ONE” 2014b, No. 9, e94842, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094842.

Edlund J.E., Sagarin B.J., Skowronski J.J., Johnson S.J., Kutter J., Whatever Happens in the Laboratory Stays in the Laboratory: The Prevalence and Prevention of Participant Crosstalk, “Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin” 2009, No. 35, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167208331255.

Eriksson K., Simpson B., Emotional Reactions to Losing Explain Gender Differences in Entering a Risky Lottery, “Judgment and Decision Making” 2010, No. 5.

Gao S., Zika O., Rogers R.D., Thierry G., Second Language Feedback Abolishes the “Hot Hand” Effect During Even-Probability Gambling, “The Journal of Neuroscience” 2015, No. 35, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3622-14.2015.

Geipel J., Hadjichristidis C., Surian L., How Foreign Language Shapes Moral Judgment, “Journal of Experimental Social Psychology” 2015a, No. 59, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.02.001.

Geipel J., Hadjichristidis C., Surian L., The Foreign Language Effect on Moral Judgment: The Role of Emotions and Norms, “Plos One” 2015b, No. 10 (7), e0131529, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131529.

Goodman J.K., Cryder C.E., Cheema A., Data Collection in a Flat World: The Strengths and Weaknesses of Mechanical Turk Samples, “Journal of Behavioral Decision Making” 2013, No. 26 (3), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1753.

Hadjichristidis C., Geipel J., Savadori L., The Effect of Foreign Language in Judgments of Risk and Benefit: The Role of Affect, “Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied” 2015, No. 21, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xap0000044.

Harris C.L., Ayçiçeĝi A., Gleason J.B., Taboo Words and Reprimands Elicit Greater Autonomic Reactivity in a First Language than in a Second Language, “Applied Psycholinguistics” 2003, No. 24, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000286.

Horton J.J., Chilton L.B., The Labor Economics of Paid Crowdsourcing, “In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce” 2010.

Horton J.J., Rand D.G., Zeckhauser R.J., The Online Laboratory: Conducting Experiments in a Real Labor Market, “Experimental Economics” 2011, No. 14 (3), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9273-9.

Kahneman D., Miller D.T., Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to its Alternatives, “Psychological Review” 1986, No. 93, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136.

Kahneman D., Tversky A., The Psychology of Preferences, “Scientific American” 1982, No. 246.

Keysar B., Hayakawa S.L., An S.G., The Foreign-Language Effect: Thinking in a Foreign Tongue Reduces Decision Biases, “Psychological Science” 2012, No. 23, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611432178.

Kittur A., Chi E.H., Suh B., Crowdsourcing User Studies with Mechanical Turk, “In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems” 2008.

Levitt S.D., List J.A., Field Experiments in Economics: The Past, the Present, and the Future, “European Economic Review” 2009, No. 53 (1).

Loewenstein G.F., Weber E.U., Hsee C.K., Welch N., Risk as Feelings, “Psychological Bulletin” 2001, No. 127, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267.

Mason W., Suri S., Conducting Behavioral Research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, “Behavior Research Methods” 2012, No. 44 (1), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6.

Opitz B., Degner J., Emotionality in a Second Language: It’s a Matter of Time, “Neuropsychologia” 2012, No. 50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.021.

Oppenheimer D.M., Meyvis T., Davidenko N., Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power, “Journal of Experimental Social Psychology” 2009, No. 45.

Orne M.T., On the Social Psychology of the Psychological Experiment: With Particular Reference to Demand Characteristics and their Implications, “American Psychologist” 1962, No. 17.

Paolacci G., Chandler J., Ipeirotis P., Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk, “Judgment and Decision Making” 2010, No. 5 (5), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1626226.

Samuelson W., Zeckhauser R., Status Quo Bias in Decision Making, “Journal of Risk and Uncertainty” 1988, No. 1, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564.

Suri S., Watts D.J., Cooperation and Contagion in Web-based, Networked Public Goods Experiments, “PLoS One” 2011, No. 6 (3).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/h.2016.50.3.151
Date of publication: 2016-09-20 17:44:04
Date of submission: 2016-04-19 01:16:45


Statistics


Total abstract view - 675
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (Język Polski) - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Rafał Muda

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.