Dualistic organization of the executive authority: theory issues and modern ukrainian experience
Аннотация
The form of government established by the current version of the Constitution of Ukraine generally meets the criteria of a mixed republic. One of the distinguishing features of the mixed republican form of government is the dualism of executive power, which provides for the constitutional consolidation of the joint competence of the president and the government in the executive branch. The presence of the president and the prime minister as two leading subjects of the executive power, none of whom dominates competently, prevents the abuse of executive power. The dualistic organization of the executive power also makes it possible to reduce the danger of a tough confrontation between the head of state and the parliament, a potential flaw of the presidential form of government, and the threat of permanent governmental instability, a potential flaw of the parliamentary form of government. The model of competence relations between the president and the government has a decisive influence on the effectiveness of the mixed republic. The general mixed republic approach to the division of powers between the president and the prime minister in the executive branch is that although the respective powers of these subjects are “intertwined”, the powers of the president are decisive. The president as a head of state is mainly responsible for solving strategic issues, controls such spheres of state authority activities as foreign policy, national security and defense, while the prime minister solves tactical tasks and carries out operational, day-to-day management. The analysis of the relationship between the president and the executive power characteristic of a mixed republic provides the necessary criteria for assessing the distribution of the joint competence of the President of Ukraine and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine established by the Constitution of Ukraine. The model of competence relationships of these subjects, established by the initial version of the Constitution of Ukraine, corresponds to a greater extent to the criteria of the presidential form of government, and the current version of the Constitution of Ukraine complies with the criteria of a mixed parliamentary-presidential republic. At the same time, the tools of influence on the executive power available to the President of Ukraine are obviously insufficient and create serious complications in the implementation of the constitutional status of the head of state.
Ключевые слова
Полный текст:
PDF (English)Литература
Normative acts, documents
Constitution of October 4, 1958, https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/sites/default/files/as/root/bank_mm/anglais/constiution_anglais_juillet2008.pdf.
Constitution of the Portuguese Republic, https://www.parlamento.pt/sites/EN/Parliament/Documents/Constitution7th.pdf.
Constitution of the Republic of Poland, https://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/angielski/kon1.htm.
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 28 chervnia 1996 r. № 254/96-вр, “Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy” 1996, № 30, Art. 141.
Pro Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy : Zakon Ukrainy vid 21 hrudnia 2006 r. № 514-V, “Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy” 2007, № 6, Art. 7.
Pro Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy : Zakon Ukrainy vid 27 liutoho 2014 r. № 794-VII, “Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy” 2014, № 13, Art. 222.
Pro Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy : Zakon Ukrainy vid 7 zhovtnia 2010 r. № 2591-VI, “Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy” 2011, № 9, Art. 58.
The Constitution of Finland, https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1999/en19990731.pdf.
The Constitution of the Republic of Croatia, https://www.usud.hr/sites/default/files/dokumenti/The_consolidated_text_of_the_Constitution_of_the_Republic_of_Croatia_as_of_15_January_2014.pdf.
Vysnovok Komisii za demokratiiu cherez pravo (Venetsianskoi komisii) “Pro konstytutsiinu sytuatsiiu v Ukraini” vid 17-18 hrudnia 2010 r., http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_a36.
Vysnovok shchodo trokh proektiv zakoniv pro vnesennia zmin do Konstytutsii Ukrainy. Pryiniatyi Venetsianskoiu Komisiieiu na yii 57-mu plenarnomu zasidanni (Venetsiia, 12-13 hrudnia 2003 r.), [u:] Konstytutsiina reforma: ekspertnyi analiz, Kharkiv, Folio 2004.
Literature
Aleksiev A., Bezotvetstvennost monarha i otvetstvennost pravitelstva, Moscow: Tipografiya tovarischestva I. D. Sytina 1907.
Ardant F., Les institutions de la Ve République. Hachette supérieur 2019.
Averyanov V., Dualizm vykonavchoi vlady u svitli konstytutsiinoho vdoskonalennia formy derzhavnoho pravlinnia v Ukraini, “Visnyk Constytutsiynoho Sudu Ukrainy” 2010, № 3, p. 106-115.
Averyanov V., Uriad u mekhanizmi podilu vlady: nedoskonalist vitchyznianoi konstytutsiinoi modeli, “Pravo Ukrainy” 2005, № 4, p. 10-16.
Averyanov V., Vykonavcha vlada v Ukraini: orhanizatsiia ta rozvytok instytutiv, [u:] Derzhavotvorennia i pravotvorennia v Ukraini: dosvid, problemy, perspektyvy, Kyiv: Institute of State and Law named after V. M. Koretskyi 2001.
Barabash Yu., Prezydentska vlada u zmishanykh respublikakh: okremi pytannia teorii ta praktyky, “Pravo Ukrainy” 2014, № 8, p. 67-76.
Dakhova I., Rozpodil povnovazhen mizh Prezydentom Ukrainy i Kabinetom Ministriv Ukrainy, “Forum prava” 2011, № 1, p. 241-245.
Gorbunova L., Pryntsyp zakonnosti u normotvorchii diialnosti orhaniv vykonavchoi vlady, Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter 2008.
Holmes S., Postkommunisticheskiy institut prezidenta, “Konstitutsionnoe pravo: vostochnoevropeyskoe obozrenie” 1994, № 4-5, p. 53-57.
Okrema dumka suddi Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy Shapovala V. M. stosovno Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam 73 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) zdiisnenoho Prezydentom Ukrainy prava veto stosovno pryiniatoho Verkhovnoiu Radoiu Ukrainy Zakonu Ukrainy “Pro vnesennia zmin do statti 98 Konstytutsii Ukrainy” ta propozytsii do noho (sprava shchodo prava veto na zakon pro vnesennia zmin do Konstytutsii Ukrainy) vid 11 bereznia 2003 r. № 6-рп/2003, “Visnyk Constytutsiynoho Sudu Ukrainy” 2003, № 2, p. 16-20.
Petryshyn О., Forma derzhavnoho pravlinnia v Ukraini: do poshuku konstytutsiinoi modeli, “Pravo Ukrainy” 2014, № 8, p. 105-116.
Sartori J., Porivnialna konstytutsiina inzheneriia: Doslidzhennia struktur, motyviv i rezultativ, Kyiv: ArtEk 2001, 224 p.
Shapoval V., Konstytutsiino-pravovyi mekhanizm derzhavnoi vlady v nezalezhnii Ukraini: polityko-pravovi problemy orhanizatsii vykonavchoi vlady, “Pravo Ukrainy” 1997, № 1, p. 30-34.
Shapoval V., Suchasnyi konstytutsionalizm, Kyiv: Salkom, Yurinkom Inter 2005.
Shapoval V., Vykonavcha vlada v Ukraini u konteksti formy derzhavnoho pravlinnia (dosvid pislia pryiniattia Konstytutsii Ukrainy 1996 roku), “Pravo Ukrainy” 2016, № 4, p. 72-88.
Shugart M., Carrie J., Prezidentskie sistemyi, https://info.wikireading.ru/241644.
Valenzuela A., Latin American presidencies interrupted, “Journal of democracy”. Baltimore, MD 2004, vol. 15, N 4, p. 5-19.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/we.2024.10.1.89-110
Date of publication: 2024-12-27 21:07:37
Date of submission: 2024-01-21 18:25:40
статистика
показатели
Ссылки
- На текущий момент ссылки отсутствуют.
(c) 2024
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.