Introduction : La linguistique cognitive et au-delà - des mécanismes conceptuels aux apories théoriques
Résumé
Mots-clés
Texte intégral :
PDF (English)Références
Ahlgren, K., Golden, A., & Magnusson, U. (2021). Metaphor in education: A multilingual and Scandinavian perspective. Metaphor and the Social World, 11(2), 196–211.
Arbib, M. (Ed.). (2020). How the Brain Got Language – Towards a New Road Map. John Benjamins.
Barcelona, A. (2003). The case for a metonymic basis of pragmatic inferencing: Evidence from jokes and funny anecdotes. In K.-U. Panther, & L. L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp. 81–102). John Benjamins.
Bierwiaczonek, B. (2013). Metonymy in language, thought and brain. Equinox Publishing.
Caballero, R., Suárez-Toste E., & Paradis, C. (2019). Representing Wine. Sensory Perception, Communication, and Cultures. John Benjamins.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Dąbrowska, A. (2023). Introduction: Within Semantic-Conceptual Structure and Beyond. Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature, 47(1), 1–10.
Dąbrowska, E., & Divjak, D. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. De Gruyter Mouton.
Evans, V. (2012). Cognitive Linguistics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3, 129–141.
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.
Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2017). Thinking about the future: The role of spatial metaphors for time. In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E. J. Davelaar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 361–366). Cognitive Science Society.
Fortescue, M. (2021). Polysemy, Diachrony and the Circle of Cognition. Brill.
Głaz, A., Łozowski, P., & Danaher, D. S. (Eds.). (2013). The Linguistic Worldview: Ethnolinguistics, Cognition, and Culture. De Gruyter.
Hess, L. (2022). Slurs: Semantic and Pragmatic Theories of Meaning. In P. Stalmaszczyk (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Philosophy of Language (pp. 450–465). Cambridge University Press.
Kijania-Placek, I. (2022). Indexicals and Contextual Involvement. In P. Stalmaszczyk (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Philosophy of Language (pp. 266–282). Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Kwiatkowska, A. (2007). Pre-linguistic and non-linguistic metonymy. In K. Kosecki (Ed.), Perspectives on Metonymy (pp. 297–307). Peter Lang Verlag.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal About the Mind. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, R. T. (1974). Remarks on This and That. In M. LaGaly, R. Fox & A. Bruck (Eds.), Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 345–356). Chicago Linguistic Society.
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Li, K., & Zhu, H. (2021). Power and gender. Metaphors in mergers and acquisitions texts in a Chinese financial newspaper. Chinese Language and Discourse, 12(2), 238–258.
Majid, A., Burenhult, N., Stensmyr, M., de Valk, J., & Hansson, B. S. (2018). Olfactory language and abstraction across cultures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 373, 20170139.
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L. (2018). What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy? In O. Blanco Carrión, A. Barcelona, & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues (pp. 121–160). John Benjamins.
Piata, A., & Soriano, C. (2022). The affect bias in the metaphorical representation of anticipated events: The case of approach. Metaphor and the Social World, 12(1), 115–137.
Potts, C., & Schwarz, F. (2010). Affective “this”. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology – LILT, 3(5), 1–30.
Reza Talebinejad, M., & Vahid Dastjerdi, H. (2005). A Cross-Cultural Study of Animal Metaphors: When Owls Are Not Wise!, Metaphor and Symbol, 20(2), 133–150.
Saussure, de, F. (1916/2016). Cours de linguistique générale. Payot.
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., & Demmen, J. (2018). An Integrated
approach to Metaphor and Framing in Cognition, Discourse, and Practice, with an Application to Metaphors for Cancer. Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 625–645.
Stanojević, M.-M., Tralić, I., & Ljubičić, M. (2014). Grammatical information and conceptual metaphors: The case of anger. In A. Peti-Stantić & M.-M. Stanojević (Eds.), Language as information: Proceedings from the CALS Conference 2012 (pp. 131–154). Peter Lang Verlag.
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. Routledge.
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge University Press.
Stalmaszczyk, P. (Ed.). (2012). Współczesne językoznawstwo generatywne. Podstawy metodologiczne. Primum Verbum.
Tay, D. (2020). Critical, conceptual, and collaborative perspectives on metaphor and mental health. Metaphor and the Social World, 10(2), 191–198.
Thibodeau, P. H., Hendricks, R. K., & Boroditsky, L. (2017). How linguistic metaphor scaffolds reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(11), 852–863.
Trojszczak, M. (2019). Grounding mental metaphors in touch. A corpus-based study of English and Polish. In L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception Metaphors (pp. 209–230). John Benjamins.
Trojszczak, M., & Gebbia, C. A. (2023). A comparative study of English, Italian and Polish conceptual metaphors of emotion regulation and cognitive inhibition. In M. Deckert, P. Pęzik & R. Zago (Eds.), Language, Expressivity and Cognition (pp. 37–54). Bloomsbury.
Turner, M. (2014). The Origin of Ideas: Blending, Creativity, and the Human Spark. Oxford University Press.
Wachowski, W. (2019). Towards a Better Understanding of Metonymy. Peter Lang Verlag.
Winter, B. (2019). Sensory linguistics: Language, perception, and metaphor. John Benjamins.
Winters, M. E. (1992). Diachrony within Synchrony: the Challenge of Cognitive Grammar. In M. Putz (Ed.), Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution: Studies in Honour of René Dirven on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday (pp. 503–511). John Benjamins.
Zubicaray, de, G. I., & Schiller, N. O. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Neurolinguistics. Oxford University Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2023.47.2.1-9
Date of publication: 2023-07-19 13:53:47
Date of submission: 2023-06-12 09:22:18
Statistiques
Indicateurs
Renvois
- Il n'y a présentement aucun renvoi.
Droit d'auteur (c) 2023, Antonio Barcelona Sánchez, Marcin Trojszczak
Ce(tte) œuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.