Child and childhood in the context of child science
Abstract
The article deals with the notions of “child” and “childhood”. Attention is paid to the importance of research into the biological, spiritual and social nature of child, and to the dependence of its development upon the influence of “adult culture”, children’s subculture and personal efforts. The paper emphasizes the need for a comprehensive study of the problems of the child and childhood in terms of age, history, culture. In the context of child science, the child should be considered as an individual, individuality, personality, subject of activity. The article draws attention to the need to introduce the discipline “child studies” into pedagogical specialties.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abramenkova, V. (2008). Socialnaia psykhologiia detstva [Social Psychology of Childhood]. Moskva: PER SYE.
Adams, K. (2017). The concept of the child through a spiritual lens: Implications for interdisciplinary approaches and Religious Education. Journal of Religious Education, 65(1–3), 81–93.
Ananyev, B. (1968). Chelovek kak predmet poznaniia [Man as a Subject of Knowledge]. Leningrad: ILU.
Bohush, A. (2010). Sutnist fenomenu dytynstva ta pohliady na noho vitchyznianykh, rosiiskykh i amerykanskykh uchenykh [The essence of the phenomen of childhood and the views of domestic, Russian and American scientists]. Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu. Seriia: Pedahohichni nauky [Bulletin of Cherkasy University. Series: Pedagogical Sciences], 186.
Byford, A. (2016). V.M. Bekhterev in Russian Child Science, 1900s–1920s: “Objective Psychology”/“Reflexology” as a Scientific Movement. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Science, 52, 99–123. DOI: 10.1002/jhbs.21775.
Dutkevych, T., Savytska, O. (2010). Praktychna psykholohiia [Practical Psychology]. Kyiv: TSUL.
Feldstein, D. (1995). Socialnoe razvitie v prostranstve-vremeni detstva [Social Development in the Space-time of Childhood]. Moskva: Flinta.
Kjørholt, A. (2013). Childhood as social investment, rights and the valuing of education. Children & Society, 27, 245–257. DOI: 10.1111/chso.12037.
Kon, I. (1999). Sociologicheskaia psykhologiia [Social Psychology]. Moskva: MPSU.
Kryvachuk, L., Kostyshyn, E. (2014). Naukovyi dyskurs stosovno fenomenu dytynstva: vyokremlennia derzhavno-upravlinskoho dytynotsentrychnoho pidkhodu [Scientific discourse of the phenomenon of childhood: the separation of state-management childhood-centered approach].
Efektyvnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia [Effectiveness of Public Administration], 41.
Luparenko, S. (2015). Pytannia dytynstva u vitchyznianii pedahohitsi ХХ stolittia: teoriia ta prakyka [The Question of Childhood in the National Pedagogy of the Twentieth Century: Theory and Practice]. Kharkiv: KHNPU.
Samoilenko, N. (2009). Sotsiolohiia dytynstva yak obiekt sotsiolohichnykh doslidzhen [Sociology of childhood as an object of sociological research]. Ukrainskyi sotsium [Ukrainian Society], 1(28).
Stelmakhovych, M. (1991). Narodnopedahohichni pohliady na dytynu [Ethnopedagogical views on the child]. Narodna tvorchist ta etnohrafia [Folk Art and Ethnography], 5.
Tabor, J. (2016). Childhood, Sociology of. In: C.L. Shehan (ed.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Family Studies. UK: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs109.
Wing Han Lamb, W. (2001). The “whole child” in education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35(2).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/j.2019.32.1.49-60
Date of publication: 2019-09-25 12:08:17
Date of submission: 2018-09-16 23:18:39
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.