Axiopsychological Refutation of Totalitarian Ideologisms in the Era of Globalization

Zinoviia Karpenko

Abstract


The article states that ideologisms are certain elements of an ideology which, by manifesting the political culture of society, fill it with a specific ethnical content. Ideologisms are embodied in myths, legends, traditions, collective conceptions, propaganda narratives, typical social illusions, etc. They represent the historical experience of the people, and, in the first place, render their geopolitical, crathological, militaristic aspirations in the context of their own ideological views and attitudes to other ethnic and cultural communities. Totalitarian ideologisms express a destructive subject-object attitude of certain society (the state) to large out-groups in terms of their usefulness for its own interests and are typical of totalitarian societies. Constructive ideologisms are based on the culture of tolerance and respect for the dignity of others; they are an example of a subject-subject attitude which is inherent in a democratic society.


Keywords


axiopsychology; globalism; ideology; totalitarianism; tolerance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Асмолов А., Шехтер Е. (2013), Черноризов А. Историко-эволюционный синтез: взаимная помощь как фактор эволюции, «Вопросы психологии», 6.

Alexander B.K. (2008), The Globalisation of Addiction. A Study in the Poverty of the Spirit, New York.

Грицанов A. (2001), Идеология, [в:] A. Грицанов (ред.), Всемирная энциклопедия: Философия, Moсква, Mинск.

Юревич А. (2013), К проблеме базових компонентов национального менталитета, «Психологический журнал», 4.

Kaldor M., Vejvoda I. (eds.) (1999), Democratization in Central and Eastern Europe, London, New York.

Карпинский К. (2013), Конфликт ценностей как предпосылка смысложизненного кризиса в развитии личности, «Вопросы психологии», 1.

Nissen М. (2015), Meeting Youth in Movement and on Neutral Ground, “Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal”, 3.

Почебут Л. (2013), Межкультурная коммуникативная компетентность как выражение человеческих отношений, «Психологический журнал», 4.

Рачева E. (2014), Академик Александр Асмолов: «Грядущий хам стал хамом нынешним», www.colta.ru/articles/society/4588 (access: 11.09.2015).

Степин В. (2001), Культура, [в:] A. Грицанов (ред.), Всемирная энциклопедия: Философия, Moсква, Mинск.

Шаюк О. (2014), Психосутнісна характеристика толерантності в контексті аксіологічного підходу, «Вітакультурний млин: методологічний альманах», 16.

Вербер Б. (2011), Тайна богов, Москва.

Vusatyuk O. (2014), Social Mythology of the Globalization Era, “Scientific Notes of Taurida National V.І. Vernadsky University. Series: Philosophy. Culturology. Political Sciences. Sociology”, 1–2.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/j.2015.28.2.59
Date of publication: 2016-09-07 12:34:45
Date of submission: 2016-02-25 14:07:35


Statistics


Total abstract view - 1124
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 481

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Zinoviia Karpenko

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.