External Factors in Political Transition in Eastern Europe: Democratization Through Convergence

Galyna Zelenko

Abstract


The ways post-communist countries develop are fundamentally different. The democratic transition that began in these countries almost simultaneously resulted in the formation of various political regimes in the post-communist space after more than 25 years of transformation – from consolidated democracies in Central and Eastern Europe and the Baltics, to openly autocratic political regimes in Asian republics, Belarus and Russia. Some authors believe that it is the ”distance to Brussels” that determines the level of democracy development in post-communist countries. But the “distance to Moscow” determines political transition too. That is, the depth of integration with Brussels, on the one hand, and Moscow, on the other, determines the quality of a political regime. All this gives grounds for the hypothesis that convergence can both stimulate democratization processes and cause their regression. So, my research sought to addresses such questions: What impact did external factors in their politics? Why convergence processes are so important for democratic transition post-communist countries of East Europe? What factors explain patterns and differences? The author pays attention to the nature of exogenous influences in the East Europe countries, which are located between two centers of power – big geopolitical players – the EU and Russia. Also, author analyzes the impact of convergence process on political transition in Ukraine as very specific case of political transition.


Keywords


democratization, convergence, external factors, political transition, Eastern Europe

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brinks D., Coppedge M., Doffusion is No Illusion: Neighbor Emulation in the Third Wave of Democracy, „Comparative Political Studies”, 2006, Vol. 39, p. 463–489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005276666.

Burnell P.J., International Democracy Promotion: A Role for Public Goods Theory? „Contemporary Politics”, 2008, Vol. 14, No. 1, p. 37–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569770801913249.

Democratization in Eastern Europe: Domestic and International Perspectives, ed. G. Pridham, T. Vanhanen New York: Routledge 1994.

Fisun O., The Future of Ukraine’s Neopatrimonial Democracy, „PONARS Eurasia”, 2015, October, No. 394.

Freedom in the world 2018 // URL: https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/nations-transit-2018.

Gleditsch K.S., Ward M.D., Diffusion and the Intarnational Context of Democratization, „International Organization”, 2006, Vol. 60, p. 911–933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060309.

GrosseT. G., Changes in EU common market in the aftermath of crises, „Studia Polityczne”, 2018, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 87–115.

Hale H., Patronal Democracy. 2015. – 530 p.

Hantington S.P., After Twenty Years: The Future of the Third Wave, „Journal of Democracy”,1997, Vol. 8, No. 4, p. 3–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1997.0059.

IMoRe dynamics in Ukraine // URL. http://imorevox.org/imore-in-charts/ Moravcsik A., Introduction: Integration International and Domestic Theories of International Bargaining, [in:] Double-Edged Doplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, ed. P.B. Evans, H.K. Jacobson, R.D., Berkleley (CA): University of California Press 1993, p. 5–9.

Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores// URL. https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2018/ukraine Smith T., America’s Mission. The United States and the World Worldwide Straggle for Democracy in the Twentieth Century, Princeton (NJ): Prinston University Press 1994, pp. 309.

Whitehead L., Democracy by Convergence and Southern Europe: A Comparative Politics Perspective, [in:] Encouraging Democracy: The Intarnational Context of Regime Transition in Southern Europe, ed. By G. Pridham, New York: St. Martin’s Press 1991, p. 1–29.

Whitehead L., Democratisation: Theory and Experience, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.

Wobec wyzwań jutra, ed. W. Morawski, Warsaw: Wolter Kluver, 2016.

Гельман B., «Подрывные» институты и неформальное управление в современной России, „Полития”, 2010, № 2, c. 6–24.

Гельман B., Politicsversuspolicy: технократические ловушки постсоветских преобразований, СПб.: Издательство Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге 2017, cc. 38.

Колтон Т., Чарап C., Украинский кризис: Победителей нет, „Россия в глобальной политике”, Спецвыпуск, 2017, Декабрь, с. 46–47.

Розов Н.С., Неопатримониальные режимы: разнообразие, динамика и перспективы демократизации, „Полис. Политическиеисследования”, 2016, № 1, c. 139–140.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/we.2018.4.2.85
Date of publication: 2019-06-27 07:23:35
Date of submission: 2019-06-26 11:56:55


Statistics


Total abstract view - 1222
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Galyna Zelenko

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.