Hide
Show all
Email this article 
“Compensation Amendment” to the United States Constitution
Abstract
The Constitution of the United States stands out against the background of European constitutions for several reasons. First of all, it is one of the shortest constitutions considering the number of articles. Secondly, it belongs to the rigid constitutions which are hard to amend. Thirdly, any constitutional amendments are not introduced into the constitution, but are placed in the form of numbered amendments. Fourthly, since the adoption of the constitution in 1789, only 27 amendments were introduced. The last one was waiting for the entry into force for 203 years. The last amendment concerns the ban on changes in the congressman compensation during the termof-office. Considering its historical context, the “compensation amendment” provides the most interesting insights into the American constitutional amendment process.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bernstein, R.B., 1992, The Sleeper Wakes: The History and Legacy of the Twenty-Seventh Amendment, “Fordham Law Review”, 61.
Biles, Ch.M., 2017, The History of Congressional Apportionment, Humboldt State University Press, Humboldt.
Brudnick, I.A., 2018a, Congressional Salaries and Allowances: In Brief, Congressional Research Service, April 2018, https://www.senate.gov/CRSpubs/9c14ec69-c4e4-4bd8-8953-f73daa1640e4.pdf (access:10.05.2018).
Brudnick, I.A., 2018b, Salaries of Members of Congress. Recent Actions and Historical Tables, Congressional Research Service, April 2018, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/97-1011.pdf (access: 10.05.2018).
Cohen, W., Varat, J.D., 1997, Constitutional Law. Cases and Materials, Westbury, New York.
Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 433 (1939).
Collet, T.S., 2010, Judicial Independence and Accountability in an Age of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments, “Loyola University Chicago Law Journal”, 41.
Congress.Gov, https://www.congress.gov/bill/101st-congress/house-bill/3660 (access: 10.05.2018).
Constitutional Amendment Process, Federal Register, National Archives. Online version, https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/constitution (access: 12.05.2018).
Dalzell, S., Beste, E.J., 1993, Is the Twenty-Seventh Amendment 200 Years Too Late?, “The George Washington Law Review”, 62.
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008).
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857).
Hill, A.D., Ridge, J.W., Ingram, A., 2018, The Growing Conflict-of-Interest Problem in the U.S. Congress, https://hbr.org/2017/02/the-growing-conflict-of-interest-problem-in-the-u-s-congress (access: 11.05.2018).
Hollingsworth v. Virginia, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 378 (1798).
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CONAN-1992/pdf/GPO-CONAN-1992-7.pdf (access: 12.05.2018).
https://www.legistorm.com/member_of_congress_salaries.html (access: 08.05.2018).
https://www.usconstitution.net/constamrat.html (access: 12.05.2018).
Kmiec, K.D., 2004, The Origin and Current Meanings of Judicial Activism, “California Law Review”, 92.
Lynch, M.J., 2001, The Other Amendments: Constitutional Amendments that Failed, “Law Library Journal”, 93.
Lytle, D., 2007, Celebrating the Constitution, in and around the Bar, CBA President’s Message, “SEP Colorado Law”, 36.
Madison’s Speech Proposing Amendments to the Constitution, http://teachingamericanhistory.org/bor/madison_17890608/ (access: 11.05.2018).
Madison’s Speech to the House of Representatives, June 8, 1789, [in:] R.A. Licht (ed.), The Framers and Fundamental Rights, American Enterprise Institute Press, Washington D.C. 1991.
Marshfield, J.R., 2018, The Amendment Effect, “Boston University Law Review”, 98.
McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010).
Neale, T.H., 2014, The Article V Convention to Propose Constitutional Amendments: Contemporary Issues for Congress, https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20140411_R42589_f565d-06c544815456eb3805d4f52c2b5749d36b7.pdf (access: 12.05.2018).
Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. (2015).
Paulsen, M.S., 1993, A general theory of Article V: The constitutional lessons of the twentyseventh amendment, “The Yale Law Journal”, 103.
Rogers, K.J., 2007, The other way to amend the constitution: The Article V constitutional convention amendment process, “Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy”, 30.
U.S.C.: Title 1, Chapter 2, Section 106 (b) – Amendments to Constitution.
United States Constitutional Amendment Process. Legal Principles for State Legislators, Research Department, Minnesota House of Representatives, 2016.
United States Senate, https://www.senate.gov/senators/SenateSalariesSince1789.htm (access: 10.05.2018).
United States v. Sprague, 282 U.S. 716 (1931).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/teka.2018.13.1.85-95
Date of publication: 2018-12-19 11:40:42
Date of submission: 2018-12-19 10:45:21
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Izabela Kraśnicka, Elżbieta Kużelewska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.