The Principles of Regulating Attorney Incompatibility

Bertold Baranyi

Abstract


Attorney incompatibility essentially excludes attorneys from engaging in other areas of the economy. The aim of this study is to define the principles that justify this restriction and to examine the legal rules governing the grounds for attorney incompatibility. To do this end, the author first defines the concept of attorney incompatibility and then distinguishes it from other legal institutions that restrict legal practice. Subsequently, he conducts a comprehensive analysis of the regulation of this legal institution in Hungary and Europe, its domestic historical development, as well as relevant constitutional case law and the practice of EU law. On this basis, the author attempts to systematize the principles that constitute the foundation of the regulatory framework. The study also serves as a starting point for examining the practical enforcement of these principles, in particular to determine the extent to which the various grounds of incompatibility are compatible with the competitive functioning of the legal profession and its role in the administration of justice in a market economy governed by the rule of law.


Keywords


attorney incompatibility; independence of attorneys; freedom of competition; dignity of the legal profession; competitiveness of attorneys

Full Text:

PDF

References


LITERATURE

Kiss D., Csehi Z., Az ügyvédek nagy kézikönyve, Budapest 2010.

Korsósné Delacasse K., Az ügyvédi autonómiák létrejötte és működésük megkezdése Magyarországon a polgári korszakban, Pécs 2009 (PhD thesis).

Kovács A.Gy., Piacgazdaság, gazdaságszabályozás és az Alaptörvény, “Közjogi Szemle” 2017, no. 4.

Minkó R., [in:] Nagykommentár az ügyvédi törvényhez, eds. J. Bánáti, B. Baranyi, Budapest 2021.

Nagy C.I., A tagállami árszabályozás keretei az Európai Unió jogában, különös tekintettel a liberalizált piacokra, “Verseny és szabályozás” 2013, vol. 1.

Tóth T., Uniós és magyar versenyjog, Budapest 2020.

Zlinszky J., Az ügyvédség kialakulása Magyarországon és története Fejér megyében, [in:] A XII táblától a 12 ponton át a magánjog új törvényéig Fejér Megyei Ny., Székesfehérvár 1976.

ONLINE SOURCES

Minkó R., György K., Ügyvédi összeférhetetlenség elméletben és gyakorlatban, 2023, https://www.kozigkedd.hu/kozigkedd11 (access: 1.6.2026).

Pünkösty A., A szakmai kamarák tevékenységének megítélése a közösségi és a magyar versenyjogban, 2006, https://docplayer.hu/44476153-Punkosty-andras-a-szakmai-kamarak-tevekenysegenek-megitelese-a-kozossegi-es-a-magyar-versenyjogban.html (access: 25.5.2026).

Research and Documentation Directorate of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Research Note: Scope of the Requirement of Independence of Lawyer, June 2015, https://curia.europa.eu/site/upload/docs/application/pdf/2024-04/ndr_scope_of_the_requirement_of_independence_of_lawyers_en.pdf (access: 25.5.2026).

DOCUMENTS

Charter of Core Principles of the European Legal Profession.

Code of Conduct for European Lawyers (CCBE).

Statutum per Advocatos Causarum, seu Procuratores Regni Observandum, 1694.

Tripartitum opus iuris consuetudinarii inclyti regni Hungariae, 1517.

LEGAL ACTS

Act III of 1405.

Act XIV of 1471.

Act XXVII of 1567.

Act XXXIV of 1574.

Act XLIV of 1649.

Act LXI of 1655.

Act XXXIV of 1874 on the Lawyer’s Code of Conduct.

Act IV of 1937 on the Lawyer’s Code of Conduct.

Act XX of 1949 on the Constitution of the Republic of Hungary.

Act XXIII of 1991 on the Legal Profession.

Act XI of 1998 on the Attorneys.

Act LXXVIII of 2017 on Legal Practice.

Advokaten-Ordnung of 1852.

Fundamental Law of Hungary.

Legislative Decree No. 12 of 1958 on the practice of the legal profession and organizations of lawyers.

Legislative Decree No. 4 of 1983 on the legal profession.

Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

CASE LAW

Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 22/1994 (IV.16).

Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 52/1996 (XI.14).

Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 374/B/1998.

Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 428/B/1998.

Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 907/B/2004.

Judgment of the European Court of 19 February 2002, case C-309/99, J.C.J. Wouters, J.W. Savelbergh, and Price Waterhouse Belastingadviseurs BV v. Algemene Raad van de Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten, ECLI:EU:C:2002:98.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2026.35.1.11-27
Date of publication: 2026-06-24 10:09:33
Date of submission: 2024-07-30 14:17:44


Statistics


Total abstract view - 0
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Bertold Baranyi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.