Payment of Canal Dues by Carriers Carrying Out International Overseas Transportation – a Case of Legal Discrimination

Hisham Jadallah Mansour Shakhatreh

Abstract


The article is of a scientific nature and its main goal is to determine whether there is discrimination in the regulatory provisions regarding the payment of canal dues by international overseas carriers. The methodological basis of the research is the use of the comparative approach (comparison of various concepts and provisions regarding the payment of canal dues) and the empirical analysis (study of court practice). The method of the discrimination test is of decisive importance for this paper. The most important conclusions on the discriminatory nature of the regulatory provisions regarding the payment of canal dues by international carriers were formulated due to the use of the discrimination test. It has been proven that the changes in the legislation, which introduced the canal dues for Ukrainian carriers that carry out international overseas transportation, are not discriminatory. It was argued that the discrimination test of the disputed subject and the arguments of its participants should be applied in the process of resolving the dispute regarding the discrimination of legal norms.


Keywords


discrimination; international trade; international law; canal dues; judicial protection

Full Text:

PDF

References


LITERATURE

Baldwin R., Evenett S., Low P., Beyond Tariffs: Multilateralizing Non-Tariff RTA Commitments, [in:] Multilateralizing Regionalism, eds. R. Baldwin, P. Low, Cambridge 2009, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139162111.005.

De Borger B., De Bruyne D., Port Activities, Hinterland Congestion, and Optimal Government Policies: The Role of Vertical Integration in Logistic Operations, “Journal of Transport Economics and Policy” 2011, vol. 45(2).

Gao F., Song A., Fund Management Method of Ocean Shipping Enterprises Based on Cost Control Theory, “Journal of Coastal Research” 2020, no. 110 (Special Issue), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2112/JCR-SI110-068.1.

Mjelde A., Endresen Ø., Bjørshol E., Gierløff C.W., Husby E., Solheim J., Mjøs N., Eide M.S., Differentiating on Port Fees to Accelerate the Green Maritime Transition, “Marine Pollution Bulletin” 2019, vol. 149, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110561.

Rum M., Cost Efficiency of Sea Freight and Lowering Cost of Consumption Goods, “IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science” 2018, vol. 156(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/156/1/012020.

Trykhlib K., Zasada niedyskryminacji w prawie europejskim, “Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego” 2020, vol. 54(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2020.02.15.

Widijowati D., Implementation of Non-Discrimination in Respect to Determine the Appropriate Policy for Dealing with International Trade, “UUM Journal of Legal Studies” 2018, vol. 9.

Zemlytska Yu. (ed.), European and International Standards in the Field of Justice, Kyiv 2015.

ONLINE SOURCES

Khristova G., Issues of Prohibition and Counters of Discrimination, [in:] Methodological Recommendations for Lawyers, Strasbourg 2015, https://rm.coe.int/16803040d8 (access: 6.10.2022). [in Ukrainian]

World Bank, Food Security Update, 15.8.2022, https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/brief/food-security-update (access: 6.10.2022).

Kyiv School of Economics, Russian Invasion in Ukraine Could Threaten Global Food Security and Starve Hundreds of Millions Globally, 4.3.2022, https://kse.ua/ua/about-the-school/news/russian-invasion-in-ukraine-could-threaten-global-food-security-and-starve-hundreds-of-millions-globally (access: 6.10.2022).

LEGAL ACTS [IN UKRAINIAN]

Economic Code of Ukraine of 16 January 2003, No. 436-IV, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/436-15#Text (access: 6.10.2022).

Law of Ukraine “On Foreign Economic Activity” of 16 April 1991, No. 959-XII, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/959-12#Text (access: 6.10.2022).

Law of Ukraine “On Ratified of Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (with Protocols) (European Convention on Human Rights)” of 17 July 1997, No. 475/97-VR, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text (access: 6.10.2022).

Law of Ukraine “On the Execution of Decisions and Application of the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights” of 23 February 2006, No. 3477-IV, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15#Text (access: 6.10.2022).

Law of Ukraine “On the Principles of Preventing and Countering Discrimination in Ukraine” of 6 September 2012, No. 5207-VI, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5207-17#Text (access: 6.10.2022).

Merchant Shipping Code of Ukraine of 23 May 1995, No. 176/95-VR, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/176/95-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text (access: 6.10.2022).

Order of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine “On Port Dues” of 27 May 2013, No. 316, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0930-13#Text (access: 6.10.2022).

Order of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine “On the Approval of Amendments to Some Normative Legal Acts of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine” of 25 June 2019, No. 459, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0827-19#Text (access: 6.10.2022).

Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine “On the Approval of the Regulation on State Registration of Normative Legal Acts of Ministries and Other Executive Authorities” of 28 December 1992, No. 731, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/731-92-%D0%BF#Text (access: 6.10.2022).

Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine “On the Approval of the Maritime Doctrine of Ukraine for the Period Up to 2035” of 7 October 2009 No. 1307, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1307-2009-%D0%BF#Text (access: 6.10.2022).

CASE LAW

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine of 7 July 2004, C-14-rp/2004, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v014p710-04#Text (access: 6.10.2022). [in Ukrainian]

Judgment of the District Administrative Court of the City of Kyiv of 23 July 2020, C-640/3513/20, https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/90942282 (access: 6.10.2022). [in Ukrainian]

Judgment of the ECtHR of 28 November 1984 in case Rasmussen v. Denmark, application no. 8777/79.

Judgment of the ECtHR of 28 May 1985 in case Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. The United Kingdom, applications nos. 9214/80, 9473/81, 9474/81.

Judgment of the ECtHR of 21 February 1986 in case James and others v. The United Kingdom, application no. 8793/79.

Judgment of the ECtHR of 24 June 1986 in case Lithgow and others v. The United Kingdom, application no. 9006/80.

Judgment of the ECtHR of 6 April 2000 in case Thlimmenos v. Greece, application no. 34369/97.

Judgment of the ECtHR of 12 April 2006 in case Stec and others v. The United Kingdom, applications nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01.

Judgment of the ECtHR of 13 November 2007 in case D.H. and others v. The Czech Republic, application no. 57325/00.

Judgment of the Higher Administrative Court of Ukraine of 9 March 2017, C-826/23214/15, https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/65348871 (access: 6.10.2022). [in Ukrainian]

Judgment of the Sixth Appellate Administrative Court of 19 April 2021, C-640/3513/20. https://reestr.court.gov.ua/Review/96418647(access: 6.10.2022). [in Ukrainian]




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2023.32.1.251-273
Date of publication: 2023-03-28 11:24:11
Date of submission: 2022-10-06 11:28:12


Statistics


Total abstract view - 539
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Husham Jadallah Mansour Shakhatreh

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.