Evaluation of the short-term effect of tillage practices on soil hydro-physical properties

Omid Bahmani

Abstract


 Tillage is one of the most important practices that have a significant influence on the soil hydro-physical properties. In this study, the impact of the type and number of input variables with five different methods of the Retc model to predicting the moisture retention curve and soil water content in three surfaces tillage NT (No-tillage), CP (Chisel Plough) and MP (Moldboard Plough) and the impact of tillage systems on soil hydro-physical properties were evaluated. According to results, when the field capacity and wilting point moisture was added to input data in Retc to predict the moisture curve model parameters, the EF was increased in MP (0.977, 0.95) and CP (0.891, 0.86) treatments compare the NT (0.665, 0.608). The Mualem–Van Genuchten model can describe satisfactorily the simulation of soil physical properties. The S-index, which was also affected by tillage, was greater than 0.066 in all tillage treatments, indicating good soil physical quality. Results indicated that NT had the highest and lowest values of bulk density (1.55 Mgr.m-3) and total available water (TAW) (0.038 m.m-1), respectively, and the differences between NT and MP in total porosity was significant. Overall, in most soil layers, tillage practices affected the porosity and total available water in the order MP > CP > NT. Water retention curves indicated that the water retention capacity was greater in tilled than in no-tilled and saturated hydraulic conductivity values were greater in tilled treatments than in NT soil.


Keywords


tillage, soil hydraulic properties, soil water retention

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adefemi, B.A., Wole, A.C., 2013. Soil-Water Characteristics Curves for Compacted Abandoned Dumpsite Soil. Department of Civil Engineering, Osun State University, P. M. B. 4494, Osogbo, Nigeria. Vol. 18, Bund. Pp. 3315-3338.

Afzalinia, S., Zabihi, J., 2014. Soil compaction variation during corn growing season under conservation tillage. Soil Tillage Research, 137: 1–6.

Aikins, S.H.M., Afuakwa, J.J., 2012. Effect of four different tillage practices on soil physical properties under cowpea. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 3: 17–24.

Alletto, L., Coquet, Y., 2009. Temporal and spatial variability of soil bulk density and near saturated hydraulic conductivity under two contrasted tillage management systems. Geoderma, 152: 85–94.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D5084-03., 2003. Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

Barzegar, A.R., Yousefi, A., Daryashenas, A., 2002. The effect of addition of different amounts and types of organic materials on soil physical properties and yield of wheat. Plant and Soil, 247(2): 295-301.

Bhattacharyya, R., Prakash, V., Kundu, S., Gupta, HS., 2005. Effect of tillage and crop rotations on pore size distribution and soil hydraulic conductivity in sandy clay loam soil of the Indian Himalayas. Soil Tillage Research, 86: 129-140.

Ciollaro, G., Lamaddalena, N., 1998. Effect of tillage on the hydraulic properties of a vertic soil. Agricultural Engineering Research, 71: 147–155.

Calonego, J.C., Rosolem, C.A., 2011. Soil water retention and s index after crop rotation and chiselling. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo, 35: 1927–1937. Doi: 10.1590/S0100-06832011000600009

Czyż, E.A., Dexter, A.R., 2008. Soil physical properties under winter wheat grown with different tillage systems at selected locations. International Agrophysics, 22: 191–200.

Daraghmeh, O.A., Jensen, J.R., Petersen, C.T., 2008. Near-saturated hydraulic properties in the surface layer of a sandy loam soil under conventional and reduced tillage. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 72: 1728–1737. doi:10.2136/sssaj2007.0292

Dexter, A.R., 2004. Soil physical quality: Part I. Theory, effects of soil texture, density and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma, 120: 201–214.

Dexter, A.R., Czyz, E.A., 2007. Applications of S-theory in the study of soil physical degradation and its consequences. Land Degradation & Development, 18: 369–381.

Dexter, A.R., Richard, G., 2009. Tillage of soils in relation to their bi-modal pore size distributions. Soil Tillage Research, 103: 113–118.

Ferreras, L.A., Costa, J.L., Garcia, F.O., Pecorari, C., 2000. Affects of no-tillage on some soil physical properties of a structural degraded Petrocalcic Paleudoll of the southern “Pampa” of Argentina. Soil Tillage Research, 54: 31-39.

Gate, O.P., Czyz, E.A., Dexter, A.R., 2006. Soil physical quality, S, as a basis for relationships between some key physical properties of arable soils. Advance in GeoEcology, 38: 102–109.

Givi, J., Prasher, S.O., Patel, R.M., 2004. Evaluation of pedotransfer functions in predicting the soil water contents at field capacity and wilting point. Agricultural Water Management, 70: 83–96.

Gill, S.M., 2012. Temporal variability of soil hydraulic properties under different soil management practices. University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada (PhD thesis).

Jabro, J.D., Iversen, W.M., Stevens, W.B., Evans, R.G., Mikha, M.M., Allen, B.L., 2015. Effect of three tillage depths on sugarbeet response and soil penetrability resistance. Agronomy Journal, 107: 1481–1488.

Ji, B., Zhao, Y., Mu, X., Liu, K., Li, C., 2013. Effects of tillage on soil physical properties and root growth of maize in loam and clay in central China. Plant Soil Environment, 59: 295–302.

Kovac, K., Zak, S., 1999. The effect of different types of soil cultivation on its physical and hydrophysical properties. ROSTLIN VYR, 45(8): 359-364.

Krause, P., Boyle, D.P., Bäse, F., 2005. Advances in Geosciences Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Advances in Geosciences, 5: 89–97.

Lin, B., Cerato, AB., 2012. Investigation on Soil–Water Characteristic Curves of Untreated and Stabilized Highly Clayey Expansive Soils. Geodetic Geology Engineering, 30: 803–812.

Miriti, J.M., Kironchi, G., Esilaba, A.O., Gachene, C.K., Heng, L.K., Mwang, D.M., 2013. The effect of tillage systems on soil physical properties and water conservation in a sandy loam soil in Eastern Kenya. Journal of Soil Sciences and Environmental Management, 4: 146–154.

Mualem, Y., 1976. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resources Research, 12: 513-522.

Nkakini, S.O., Fubara-Manuel, I., 2012. The effects of tillage methods on soil penetration resistance, porosity and okra yield. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4: 387–392.

Nyamangara, J., Gotosa, J., Mpofu, SE., 2001. Cattle manure effects on structural stability and water retention capacity of a granitic sandy soil in Zimbabwe. Soil and Tillage Research, 62: 157-162.

Schaap, M.G., Leij, F.J., Van Genuchten, M Th., 2001. ROSEETA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. Journal of Hydrology, 251: 163-176.

Schwen, A., Bodner, G., Loiskandl, W., 2011. Time-variable soil hydraulic properties in near-surface soil water simulations for different tillage methods. Agricultural Water Management 99, 42–50. doi:10.1016/j.ag wat.2011.07.020

Tormena, C.A., Pda Silva, A., Imhoff, S.D.C., 2008. Quantification of the soil physical quality of a tropical oxisol using the S index. Scientia Agricola, 65, 56–60.

Tyler, S.W., Wheatcraft, S.W., 1992. Fractal scaling of soil particle-size distributions: Analysis and Limitations. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56: 362-369.

Van Genuchten, M.Th., 1980. A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44: 892–898.

Van Genuchten, M.Th., Leij, FJ., Yates, SR., 1991. The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils. US-EPA, Ada, Oklahoma. Report. 600: 2-91/ 065.

Walczak, R.T., Moreno, F., Slawin S.C., 2006. Modeling of soil water retention curve using soil solid phase parameters. Journal of Hydrology, 329: 527-533.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/pjss.2019.52.1.43
Date of publication: 2019-05-29 07:01:42
Date of submission: 2018-05-05 20:33:06


Statistics


Total abstract view - 941
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 669

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 omid bahmani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.