Mediatization and Justice: How Public Participation Influences Legal Processes Through Online Discovery
Abstract
Mediatization has been widely studied in politics and culture, but its implications for law remain underexplored. This research addresses that gap by analyzing how the evolving media landscape – characterized by accessible legal materials and the rise of DIY culture enabled by digital tools and social media – creates new opportunities for non-professionals to engage with legal cases. The study investigates the kinds of discoveries activists can make when discourse and action are democratized, illustrating how public engagement, facilitated by mediatization, can lead to significant contributions in legal contexts. The study focuses on how public participation influenced Roman Zadorov’s 2023 acquittal in the murder case of Tair Rada in Israel. In the Zadorov case, activists consulted experts, re-analyzed evidence, and uncovered new findings, demonstrating how public involvement reshaped legal narratives and outcomes. Rather than arguing that law is driven by media, this study demonstrates how mediatization provides structures of opportunities that can make legal processes more transparent and inclusive.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ben-Israel, D. (2016, February 15). “The Tube” celebrates 900K and Ynet is in a hysterical pressure: Ranking of Facebook pages for January 2016. Mizbala. http://mizbala.com/digital/social-media/109150.
Burgess, J.E., & Green, J.B. (2009). The Entrepreneurial Vlogger: Participatory Culture Beyond the Professional-Amateur Divide. Wallflower Press.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12019
Deacon, D., & Stanyer, J. (2014). Mediatization: Key concept or conceptual bandwagon? Media, Culture & Society, 36(7), 1032–1044. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714542218
DePaula, N., Dincelli, E., & Harrison, T.M. (2018). Toward a typology of government social media communication: Democratic goals, symbolic acts and self-presentation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.003
Findlay, L. (2015). Courting social media in Australia’s criminal courtrooms: The continuing tension between promoting open justice and protecting procedural integrity. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 27(2), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2015.12036043
Fountain, J.E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Brookings Institution Press.
Fox, R.L., & Rose, M. (2014). Public engagement with the criminal justice system in the age of social media. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 4(4).
Giaxoglou, K., & Döveling, K. (2018). Mediatization of emotion on social media: Forms and norms in digital mourning practices. Social Media + Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117744393
Grossman, N., & Lev-On, A. (2023). Social media jurors: Conceptualizing and analyzing online public engagement in reference to legal cases. Crime Law and Social Change, 79(3), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-022-10047-w
Harriss, C. (2017). The producer as fan: Forensic fandom and the good wife. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 41(4), 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859917712233
Hepp, A. (2017). Transforming communications: Media-related changes in times of deep mediatization. Communicative Figurations Working Paper Series.
Hepp, A. (2019). Deep Mediatization. Routledge.
Hjarvard, S. (2017). Mediatization. The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0107
Jensen, K.B. (2013). Definitive and sensitizing conceptualizations of mediatization. Communication Theory, 23(3), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12014
Jiménez-Gómez, C.E., & Gascó-Hernández, M. (Eds.). (2016). Achieving Open Justice Through Citizen Participation and Transparency. IGI Global.
Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (Eds.). (2010). DIY Media: Creating, Sharing and Learning with New Technologies (vol. 44). Peter Lang.
Kopecka-Piech, K. (2019). Mediatization of Physical Activity: Media Saturation and Technologies. Rowman & Littlefield.
Kozinets, R.V. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage.
Landerer, N. (2013). Rethinking the logics: A conceptual framework for the mediatization of politics. Communication Theory, 23(3), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12013
Lev-On, A. (2022). Polarization of deliberative and participatory activists in social media. Media and Communication, 10(4), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5637
Lev-On, A. (2023a). Democratizing the discourse on criminal justice in social media: The activity for justice for Roman Zadorov as a case study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 770. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02302-9
Lev-On, A. (2023b). Making sense of murder: Stories in social media groups dedicated to justice for wrongfully convicted. Media Culture and Society, 45(8), 1708–1719. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437231202151
Lev-On, A. (2023c). The Murder of Tair Rada and the Trial of Roman Zadorov: Establishment, Justice, Citizens and Social Media. Yedioth Books. (in Hebrew).
Lev-On, A. (2024). Ad-hoc activism: Characteristics of administrators of activist groups on social media. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 19(2–3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp_00080_1
Lev-On, A., & Steinfeld, N. (2024). The power of the visual Web: Watching online videos influences viewers’ opinion about what’s in the videos and also about what’s not in the videos. Heliyon, e27895.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27895
McLachlin, B. (2003). Courts, transparency and public confidence – to the better administration of justice. Deakin Law Review, 8(1), 1–11.
Mergel, I. (2013). Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.12.004
Meyen, M., Thieroff, M., & Strenger, S. (2014). Mass media logic and the mediatization of politics: A theoretical framework. Journalism Studies, 15(3), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.889459
Mittell, J. (2015). Complex TV: The Poetics of Contemporary Television Storytelling. NYU Press.
Örnebring, H., Van Couvering, E., Regin Öborn, D., & MacKenzie, R. (in Press). The mediatization of work? Gig workers and gig apps in Sweden. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241270470
Rageh, A., & Melewar, T.C. (2013). Using netnography research method to reveal the underlying dimensions of the customer/tourist experience. Qualitative Market Research, 16(2), 126–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751311317558
Schudson, M. (2002). The news media as political institutions. Annual Review of Political Science, 5(1), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.111201.115816
Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319097
Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2017). Political public relations and mediatization: The strategies of news management. In P. Van Aelst & S. Walgrave (Eds.), How Political Actors Use the Media: A Functional Analysis of the Media’s Role in Politics (pp. 63–83). Springer.
Ure, M. (2019) Social media use in justice administration: Disintermediation, conversation and collaboration. Global Media Journal, 17(32).
Warren, M. (2014). Open justice in the technological age. Monash University Law Review, 40(1), 45–58.
Wei, M. (2024). Mediatization of religion and its impact on youth identity formation in contemporary China. Religions, 15(3), 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030268
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/ms.2024.8.47-67
Date of publication: 2025-01-27 13:06:20
Date of submission: 2024-10-27 18:03:26
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Azi Lev-On
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.