Hide
Show all
Email this article Introduction: Within Semantic-Conceptual Structure and Beyond
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bergen, B., & Chang, N. (2005). Embodied construction grammar in simulation based language understanding. In J. O. Östman, & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 147–190). Berlin, New York: John Benjamins.
Evans, V. (2012). Cognitive linguistics. Overview. WIREs Cognitive Science, 3, 129-141. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1163.
Evans, V., Bergen, B. K., & Zinken, J. (2007). The cognitive linguistics enterprise: An overview. In V. Evans, B. K. Bergen, & J. Zinken (Eds.), The Cognitive Linguistics Reader (pp. 2–36). London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think. Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2003). Conceptual blending, form and meaning. Recherches en Communication, 19, 57–86. DOI: 10.14428/rec.v19i19.48413.
Forceville, Ch. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London, New York: Routledge.
Forceville, Ch. (2008). Pictorial and multimodal metaphor in commercials. In E. F. McQuarrie, & B. J. Phillips (Eds.), Go figure! New directions in advertising Rhetoric (pp. 178–204). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Frydrysiak, S. (2017). Taniec w sprzężeniu nauk i technologii. Nowe perspektywy w badaniach tańca. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Oficyna.
Geeraerts, D. (2006). Introduction. A rough guide to Cognitive Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp. 1–29). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Ingarden, R. (1973). The cognition of the literary work of art (R. A. Crowley & K. R. Olson, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Ingarden, R. (1947/2000). Szkice z filozofii literatury. Kraków: Znak.
Kardela, H. (2020). The linguistic sign from inside-out. Remarks on the formalist-functionalist debate: Noam Chomsky, Ronald Langacker and Daniel Dor. LaMiCuS 4(4) , 14–40. DOI: 10.32058/LAMICUS-2020-001.
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? construction. Language, 75(1), 1–33. DOI: 10.2307/417472.
Kowalewski, H. (2022). Three cognitive frameworks for analysing metaphoric plant names: Cognitive Grammar, Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Conceptual Blending Theory. Etnolingwistyka. Problemy Języka i Kultury, 34, 79–94. DOI: 10.17951/et.2022.34.79.
Kövecses, Z. (2017a). Conceptual metaphor theory. In E. Semino, & Z. Demjén (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Metaphor (pp. 13–27). London, New York: Routledge.
Kövecses, Z. (2017b). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347. DOI: 10.1515/cog-2016-0052.
Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108859127.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the human mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1976). Semantic representations and the relativity hypothesis. Foundations of Language, 14, 307–357.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 2. Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (2019). Cognitive linguistics – Foundations of language. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (2009). Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W. (2010). Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W. (2013). Modals: Striving for control. In J. I. Marín-Arrese, M. Carretero, J. Arús-Hita, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality (pp. 3–55). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W. (2016). Baseline and elaboration. Cognitive Linguistics, 27, 405–439. DOI: 10.1515/cog-2015-0126.
Mickiewicz, A. (1917). The Ackerman Steppe (E. W. Underwood, Trans.). Sonnets from the Crimea. Retrieved February 10, 2022, from https://archive.org/details/sonnetsfromcrime00mick/page/n29/mode/2up.
Paradis, C. (2011). Metonymization: A key mechanism in semantic change. In A. Barcelona, R. Benczes, & F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), What is metonymy? An attempt at building a consensus view on the delimitation of the notion of metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/hcp.28.04par.
Pérez Sobrino, P. (2017). Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Saussure, F. de (1968). Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Saussure, F. de (1971). Cours de linguistique Générale. Paris: Payot.
Saussure, F. de (1915/1981). Cours de linguistique Générale. Critical edition by Tullio de Mauro. Paris: Payot.
St. Clair, R. N. (2002). Metaphorical blends, recruited frames and metaphors across cultures. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11(3), 1–24.
Stockwell, P. (2020). Cognitive poetics. An introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Talmy, L. (1975). Figure and ground in complex sentences. Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 419–430. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Taylor, J. (2002). Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Traugott, E. C. (2012). Pragmatics and language change. In K. Allan, & K. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 549–565). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winiarska, J., & Załazińska, A. (2018). Multimodalność komunikacji. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka.
Winters, M. E. (2015). On the origins of cognitive grammar. In J. Daems, E. Zenner, K. Heylen, D. Speelman, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Change of paradigms – New paradoxes. Recontextualizing language and linguistics. Applications of cognitive linguistics 31 (pp. 149–168). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
Wojnicka, I. (2010/2011). Rudolf Laban i Analiza Ruchu. Retrieved March 13, 2020, from https://www.academia.edu/36711432/RUDOLF_LABAN_I_ANALIZA_RUCH.
Zabuzhko, O. (2020). Planet Sagebrush. Selected essays. Kyiv: Komora.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2023.47.1.1-10
Date of publication: 2023-03-17 10:36:59
Date of submission: 2023-02-20 12:37:12
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Anna Dąbrowska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.