The Level of Communication Competence of Academic Teachers Conditioned by Work Experience – Research Report
Abstract
Introduction: In a society based on ICT used in every area of life, the ability to use them becomes a key task for everyone. Having smartphones at our disposal we can carry out most of the tasks, that used to take us long hours, in a short time. Research Aim: The aim of the research was to check the level of knowledge and competence of university teachers using ICT in everyday. Method: The research used the method of diagnostic survey and the tool was the author's questionnaire Q-test -60 questions grouped in 5 categories. Results: The article presents the results of research conducted in 2018 studying academic teachers at the University of Rzeszow, their level of competence concerning using ICT in their professional work and how it relates to their work experience.. Conclusion: Technological advancement and the simplicity of its use in daily professional conversation in a university the environment have changed traditional form of communication. Very often the opportunities created by given tools alternate the competence of people using them. The results it proves right that academic teachers eagerly choose technological solutions in communication irrespective of their specialization or work experience - job seniority. The age does not influence the way academic teachers communicate. The ability of academic teachers to use ICT in their professional and private lives can provide a guarantee against digital exclusion in a ICT-based society. The use of ICT by academic teachers is a kind of bridge to cooperation with the young generation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Byerly, G., Brodie, C. S. (1999). Information literacy skills models: defining the choices. W: B. K. Stripling (red.). Learning and libraries in an information age: principles and practice, (s. 54-82). Englewood-Littleton: Libraries Unlimited. Retrieved on from:
Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J. G., & Rubin, H. (2010). Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99 (1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019714
Dutta S., Mia I. (2009). The Global Information Technology Report 2008–2009, Geneve: World Economic Forum, INSEAD. Retrieved on from: https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/2014-12/Global%20Information%20Technology%20Report%202008-2009%20-%20Mobility%20in%20a%20Networked%20World.pdf
Esparcia, A.C., Smolak-Lozano, E. (2012). Historical Development of Theoretical Conceptions on the Role of Mass Media in a Society, Lingua ac Communitas, 22, 181–203. Retrieved on from: http://lingua.amu.edu.pl/Lingua_22/10_Emilia%20Smolak-Lozano.pdf
Everett, M. R. (1986). Communication technology. The new media in society, New York: The Free Press.
Fulk, J., (2017). Social Construction of Communication Technology, Academy of Management Journal 36/5, 921- 950. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc190
https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/information-literacy/publications/ifla-guidelines-pl.pdf
Katz, J., (2017). Machines That Become Us. New York: Routledge.
Kaufman, K. (2015). Information communication technology: Challenges & some prospects from preservice education to the classroom. Mid-Atlantic Education Review, 2(1), 1–11.
Leutner, D., Fleischer, J., Grünkorn, J., Klime, E. (eds.) (2017). Competence Assessment In Education: Research, Models And Instruments., Cham: Springer-Verlag/Sci-Tech/Trade.
Majewska, K., (2018). Modern Educational Tools in the Teacher’s Work, The New Educational Review, 51, 125-135. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2018.51.1.10
Mieczakowski, A., Goldhaber, T., & Clarkson, J., (2011). Culture, communication, and change: Report on an investigation of the use and impact of modern media and technology in our lives. In Culture, communication, and change. UK: Cambridge, Engineering Design Centre.
Pei-Luen Rau, P., Qin, G., Li-Mei, W., (2008). Using mobile communication technology in highschool education: Motivation, pressure, and learning performance, Computers & Education, 50(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.03.008
Recommendation of the European Parliament and of The Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning, 2006/962/EC. Retrieved on from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32006H0962
Redmond, P., Lock, J. (2019). Secondary pre-service teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): What do they really think? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.421
Rychen, D.S. & Salganik, L.H. (eds.). (2003). Key Competencies for a Successful Life and a Well Functioning Society. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
Walat, W., (2014). Image teacher grades 1–3 school in the opinions of teachers and students of education, Education – Technology – Computer Science, 5(1), 51-62.
Walther, J. B., (1996). Computer – Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal and Hyperpersonal Interaction, Commucation Research 23/1, 3-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001
Warzocha, T. (2018). Badania pilotażowe 2018. Rzeszów (praca niepublikowana).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2021.40.4.63-76
Date of publication: 2021-12-31 11:12:50
Date of submission: 2021-09-02 20:40:29
Statistics
Indicators
Copyright (c) 2021
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.