Metaethical grounds for changing the understanding of values in Peter Singer’s ethics (in the context of his reflection on the value of human life)

Jakub Synowiec

Abstract


Following an analysis of Peter Singer’s works the article reviews metaethical grounds for possible change of perception regarding social values. The author asserts that Singer applies the principle of equal consideration of interests as a tool to assess proposed changes in societal values. The novel point made in this paper is the observation that some changes in perceiving the values of human life and their implications arising from applying the principle of equal consideration of interests in ethical reflection conducted by the philosopher on the critical level of moral reasoning, cannot be promoted as principles on the intuitive level due to the application of the principle of equal consideration of interests on the metaethical level.

Keywords


Peter Singer; metaethics; value of life; principle of equal consideration of interests

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cahill, Lisa Sowle. “Moral reason, community belonging, and global justice.” In: God, the Good and Utilitarianism: perspectives on Peter Singer, ed. Perry John, 104–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Hare, Richard Mervyn. Moral thinking: It’s Levels, Method and Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.

McGinn, Collin, “Our duties to animals and the poor.” In: Singer and his critics, ed. Dale Jamieson, 150–161. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.

Perry, John. “Where did utilitarianism come from.” In: God, the Good and Utilitarianism: perspectives on Peter Singer, ed. John Perry, 15–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Preece, Gordon. “The Unthinkable and Unlivable Singer.” In: Rethinking Peter Singer. A Christian Critique, ed. Gordon Preece, 23–67. Downers Groove: Intervarsity Press, 2002.

Singer, Peter, “Chimpanzees are People, too.” In: Ethics in The Real World, ed. Peter Singer, 63–65. Princeton – Oxford: Princeton University Pres, 2016.

Singer, Peter, Helga Kuhse, Stephen Buckle, Karen Dawson, Pascal Kasimba. Embryo Experimentation. Ethical, Legal and Social Issues. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Singer, Peter. Engaging with Christianity. In: God, the Good and Utilitarianism: perspectives on Peter Singer, ed. John Perry, 53–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Singer, Peter. How are we to live? Ethics in an age of self-interest. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Singer, Peter. “Moral Experts.” Analysis 32, no. 4 (1972): 115–117.

Singer, Peter. Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Singer, Peter. Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of Our Traditional Ethics. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin, 1994.

Singer, Peter. “Sanctity of Life or Quality of Life?.” Pediatrics 72, no. 1 (1983): 128–129.

Singer, Peter, Helga Kuhse. Should the Baby Live? The Problem of Handicapped Infants. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.

Singer, Peter. The Life You Can Save. London: Picador, 2009.

Singer, Peter. The Most Good You Can Do. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2015.

Singer, Peter. Writings on an Ethical Life. New York: The Ecco Press, 2000.

Synowiec, Jakub. “Mamy ze sobą coraz więcej wspólnego: Peter Singer i etyka chrześcijańska,” [We have more and more in common: Peter Singer and Christian ethics] an interview. In: Logos i Ethos 2016, no. 42: 155–175.

Young, Shawn. Interview: Peter Singer, https://www.shawnyoung.com/interviews/peter-si Accessed 24.08.2018.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/kw.2019.28.47-64
Date of publication: 2020-02-14 19:50:37
Date of submission: 2019-01-30 11:22:16


Statistics


Total abstract view - 1410
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jakub Synowiec

License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.pl