On the Philosophical Origin of Jürgen Habermas’ Concept of Lebenswelt – remarks and comments
Abstract
The article is an attempt to indicate the unexplored "conceptual antecedence" as the part of the genealogical context from which Jürgen Habermas’ concept derives. The first part of the text shows the convergences between this concept and the notion of „the sphere of right”(Recht) which is used by Hegel in his philosophy. Thus, the sphere of right is an area of law, social life which includes positive laws, morality and ethical institutions (family, civil society and state). Although Hegel does not separate even the "right" from the "system", but he endows it with qualities that Habermas attributes to the Lebenswelt (in his Theory of Communicative Action). The second part of the article presents several motives discussed by Arnold Gehlen in his philosophical anthropology and the theory of institutions: the rehabilitation of instrumental rationality and technology; the concept of non-discursive knowledge which determines social practices; the genesis of moral norms etc. The article demonstrates that in his concept of the Lebenswelt, Habermas shares views and reaches similar conclusions to Gehlen.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Język Polski)References
Demmerling, Christoph. Sprache und Verdinglichung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1994.
Gehlen, Arnold. Der Mensch. Seine Natur und seine Stellung in der Welt . Wiesbaden: Quelle und Meyer, 1997.
Gehlen, Arnold. Urmensch und Spätkultur . Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2004.
Gehlen, Arnold. Człowiek, Jego natura i stanowisko w świecie. Tłum. Rafał Michalski i Jarosław Rolewski. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK, 2017.
Habermas, Jürgen. „Symbolischer Ausdruck und rituelles Verhalten”. W: Tenże. Zeit der Übergänge. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2001.
Habermas, Jürgen. Moralbewuβtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp,1983.
Habermas, Jürgen, Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus . Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1976.
Habermas, Jürgen, Teoria działania komunikacyjnego, t. 1. Tłum. Andrzej M. Kaniowski, Warszawa: PWN, 1999.
Habermas, Jürgen, Teoria działania komunikacyjnego, t. 2. Tłum. Andrzej M. Kaniowski, Warszawa: PWN, 2002.
Habermas, Jürgen. „Technika i nauka jako «ideologia»”. Tłum. Małgorzata Łukasiewicz. W: Czy kryzys socjologii?, red. Jerzy Szacki, 342–396. Warszawa: Czytelnik, 1977.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Zasady filozofii prawa. Tłum. Adam Landman. Warszawa: PWN, 1969.
Honneth, Axel. Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2003.
Rehberg, Karl-Siegbert. „Eine Grundlagentheorie der Institutionen: Arnold Gehlen”. W: Die Rationalität politischer Institutionen. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven, red. Gerhard Göhler, Kurt Lenk, Rainer Schmalz-Bruns, 115–144. Wiesbaden: Nomos, 1990.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/kw.2018.26.197-220
Date of publication: 2019-01-22 00:30:39
Date of submission: 2017-03-13 11:52:59
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Rafał Andrzej Michalski
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.pl