How Could Kant’s Distinction Between Opinion, Belief, and Knowledge Address the Epistemic Challenges of the Digital Age?

Tailine Hijaz

Abstract


This paper draws on aspects of Kant’s epistemology to investigate the potential contribution of his conceptual distinctions to contemporary discourses concerning disinformation, fake news, and public discourse. Focusing on the Canon of Pure Reason in the first Critique, I examine Kant’s distinction between opinion, belief, and knowledge, as well as the role of transcendental reflection in clarifying these levels of epistemic legitimacy. The hypothesis is that this conceptual structure may clarify the confusion between different forms of assent in digital environments, where misinformation, disinformation, and conspiracy theories, for example, blur epistemic boundaries and raise questions about freedom of expression, the conditions of Enlightenment, and the viability of rational public discourse.


Keywords


Critique of Pure Reason; Kantian epistemology; digital disinformation; Enlightenment.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chagas, Flávia Carvalho. “O Cânon da Razão Pura.” In Comentários às obras de Kant. Crítica da Razão Pura, edited by Joel Thiago Klein, 721–746. Florianópolis: Centro de Investigações Kantianas—UFSC, Nefiponline, 2012. http://www.nefipo.ufsc.br/files/ 2012/11/ comentarios1.pdf (accessed December 12, 2023).

Fonnesu, Luca. “Kant on Private Faith and Public Knowledge.” Rivista di Filosofia 106 (2015): 361–390.

Gava, Gabriele. “Kant and Crusius on Belief and Practical Justification.” Kantian Review 24, no. 1 (2019): 53–75.

Gettier, Edmund L. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis 23, no. 6 (1963): 121–123. https://www.finophd.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Gettier.pdf (accessed April 22, 2025).

Guess, Andrew M., Michael Lerner, Benjamin Lyons, Jason M. Montgomery, Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler, and Neelanjan Sircar. “A Digital Media Literacy Intervention Increases Discernment between Mainstream and False News in the United States and India.” Pro-ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, no. 27 (2020): 15536–15545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920498117.

Hijaz, Tailine. “«Quanto vale a liberdade»: o problema da desinformação em face de con-cepções instrumentais e constitutivas de liberdade de expressão/ How much is freedom worth? The problem of disinformation in the face of instrumental and constitutive con-ceptions of freedom of expression”. Master Thesis, Federal University of Paraná, 2022. https://acervodigital.ufpr.br/xmlui/handle/1884/77997 (accessed April, 2025).

Hijaz, Tailine. Quanto vale a Liberdade? O problema da desinformação entre os diferentes fundamentos da liberdade de expressão. São Paulo: Dialética, 2023.

Höwing, Thomas. “Kant on Opinion, Belief and Knowledge.” In The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy, edited by Thomas Höwing. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2016.

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Nyhan, Brendan, and Jason Reifler. “The Effect of Fact-Checking on Elites: A Field Experiment on U.S. State Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (2015): 628–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12162.

Pennycook, Gordon, and David G. Rand. “Fighting Misinformation on Social Media Using Crowdsourced Judgments of News Source Quality.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, no. 7 (2019): 2521–2526. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806781116.

Pennycook, Gordon, Ziv Epstein, Mohsen Mosleh, Antonio Arechar, Dean Eckles, and David G. Rand. “Shifting Attention to Accuracy Can Reduce Misinformation Online.” Nature 592 (2021): 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2.

Stevenson, Leslie. “Opinion, Belief or Faith, and Knowledge.” Kantian Review 7 (2003): 72–100.

Vosoughi, Soroush, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. “The Spread of True and False News Online.” Science 359, no. 6380 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/kw.2025.39.43-59
Date of publication: 2025-08-13 14:59:47
Date of submission: 2025-05-10 20:39:36


Statistics


Total abstract view - 0
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Tailine Hijaz

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.