Hypocrisy as a Tool for Social Cohesion. Mandeville’s Thought in Contemporary Thought
Abstract
Despite its notoriety, some researchers point out that hypocrisy has positive sides. It serves to unite members of society with opposing views, highlights the topicality of and the need for values, and is even considered a kind of virtue in a specific political ethics. Bernard Mandeville, who followed in the footsteps of François de La Rochefoucauld, also pointed to the contribution of hypocrisy to the survival of society. In Mandeville’s thought, hypocrisy, along with other vices, is not unambiguously assessed. Hypocrisy is destructive if it harms society, but, used properly, it proves to be an excellent tool for creating a harmonious community. In my article, I will present Bernard Mandeville’s views on hypocrisy in relation to the views of contemporary researchers on the subject. I will show that Mandeville’s views on hypocrisy are encapsulated by the well-known apparent paradox in the subtitle of The Fable of the Bees – “private vices, public benefits” – and I will present their significance for contemporary research in moral psychology.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Język Polski)References
Dickey, Laurence. „Pride, hypocrisy and civility in Mandeville’s social and historical theory”. A Journal of Politics and Society 4, nr 3 (1990): 387–431.
Douglass, Robin. „Bernard Mandeville on the Use and Abuse of Hypocrisy”. Political Studies 2020: 1–18.
Fritz, Kyle G., Daniel J. Miller. „The Unique Badness of Hypocritical Blade”. Ergo. An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 2019, nr 6: 545–569.
„Hipokryzja”. W: Wielki Słownik Języka Polskiego, https://wsjp.pl/haslo/do_druku/1743/hipokryzja (dostęp: 01.11.2021).
Isserow, Jessica, Colin Klein. „Hypocrisy and Moral Authority”. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 12, nr 2 (2017): 191–222.
Karwat, Mirosław. „Polityka jako festiwal hipokryzji”. W: Metafory polityki, t. 2, red. Bohdan Kaczmarek, 291–316. Warszawa: Elipsa, 2003.
La Rochefoucauld, François de. Maksymy i rozważania moralne. Tłum. Tadeusz Boy-Żeleński. Warszawa: Hachette Polska, 2009.
Mandeville, Bernard. An Enquiry Into The Origin Of Honour And The Usefulness Of Chris-tianity In War. London: Forgotten Books, 2015.
Mandeville, Bernard. Bajka o pszczołach. Tłum. Agnieszka Glinczanka. Warszawa: PWN, 1957.
Mandeville, Bernard. Free Thoughts on Religion, the Church, & national Happiness. Red. Irwin Primer. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2001.
Mandeville, Bernard. The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, Public Benefits, t. 2. Indianapo-lis: Liberty Fund, Inc., 1960.
Młyniec, Eugeniusz. „Hipokryzja i cynizm polityków – normalność czy patologia?”. Wrocław-skie Studia Politologiczne 2019, t. 27: 86–106.
Ossowska, Maria. Motywy postępowania. Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza, 1958.
Ossowska, Maria. Normy moralne. Próba systematyzacji. Warszawa: PWN, 1970.
Ostasz, Lech. Czym są wartości? Zarys aksjologii. Olsztyn: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego, 2009.
Rogers, Arthur K. „The ethics of Mandeville”. The International Journal of Ethics 36, nr 1 (1925): 1–17.
Runciman, David. Political Hypocrisy. The Mask of Power, from Hobbes to Orwell and Be-yond. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.
Shklar, Judith N. Zwyczajne przywary. Tłum. Marcin Król. Kraków: Społeczny Instytut Wy-dawniczy Znak, Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego, 1997.
Statman, Daniel. „Hypocrisy and self‐deception”. Philosophical Psychology 10, nr 1 (1997): 57–75.
Śledzińska, Klaudia. „Hipokryzja i narracja symboliczna w polityce”. Seminare. Poszukiwania naukowe 2012, nr 32: 113–122.
Tillyris, Demetris. „The virtue of vice. A defence of hypocrisy in democratic politics”. Con-temporary Politics 22, nr 1 (2015): 1–25.
Weiss, Alexa, Pascal Burgmer, Thomas Mussweiler. „Two-Faced Morality: Distrust Promotes Divergent Moral Standards for the Self Versus Others”. Personality and Social Psycho-logy Bulletin 44, nr 12 (2018): 1–39.
Żylicz, Piotr O. Psychologia moralności. Wybrane zagadnienia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Szkoły Wyższej Psychologii Społecznej „Academica”, 2010.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/kw.2021.32.145-163
Date of publication: 2022-04-17 23:42:00
Date of submission: 2021-12-16 10:59:33
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Agnieszka Lilia Droś
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.pl