Comparative Education in Ukraine under Globalisation: Achievements and Challenges
Abstract
In Ukraine, a number of factors including the "iron curtain" disappearance, the independence proclamation in 1991, rapid ICT expansion promoted the national education openness for the worldwide achievements and actualized the comparative education role. In the independence period, an important task for the comparative education in Ukraine is to study the nature of the educational transformations in the developed countries in order to harmonize the national education development with the educational achievements of the other ones. The purpose of the article is to conduct a comparative analysis of the comparative education development in Ukraine and abroad, to outline the achievements and the challenges faced by the national comparative education nowadays.
As a result of the analysis it was concluded that in Ukraine the nature of comparative education development has its own specificity caused by the prolonged isolation and ideological pressure in the Soviet period.
The abovementioned make it impossible to find the direct parallels between the developments of comparative education in foreign countries and in Ukraine until 1991. At the same time, it was concluded that after the Ukraine independence, comparative education started to be developed as an academic field similar to the foreign comparative education methodological approaches.
Before, the "preparatory period" had lasted when the foundations of this science were laid, and the methods of comparison were developed. It should be notified that this period was varying; every decade has enriched the science of comparing with many ideas and technologies. The less was the influence of the communist ideology the fruitfully the methodological ideas and technologies were developing.
The present stage (which is determined by globalization transformations) could be characterized as the period of the national comparative education professionalization. The professionalization is characterized both by the comparative education institutionalization (institutional structure formation) and the development of its methodology. The institutionalization comprises the comparative education research centers formation; the "Comparative pedagogy" course for the future teachers in the Ukrainian universities launching; the specialized journals publication; the annual special events conducting.
The comparative education methodology also is under the process of development. The issues that remain to be open for the Ukrainian comparative educationists’ community in the aspect of the methodology primarily cover the selection of the methods for the comparative educational studies, meeting the national education requirements in terms of the determination of the common trends and patterns of the educational development abroad and primarily in Europe, the prognostication for the educational policymakers in Ukraine.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bereday G.Z.F., Comparative Method in Education, New York 1964, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bray M., Comparative Education in the Era of Globalization: Evolution, Missions and Role, “Policy Futures in Education”, 2003, Vol. 1, No. 2.
Wolhuter Ch., Popov N., Manzon M., Leutwyler B. (eds.), Comparative Education at Universities World Wide (3rd edition), With the introductory chapter by Erwin H. Epstein, Sofia, Bulgaria 2013, BCES.
Lokshyna O. (compiling editor), Comparative Education: Methodological Guidelines of the Ukrainian Comparative Educationists: reader, K.: Pedagogic Opinion, 2015.
Lokshyna O., Professionalization of the Comparative Education in Ukraine: Achievements and Challenges under the Framework of the Pedagogical Comparative Studies Abroad, “Comparative Educational Studies: scholarly journal”, 2014, No. 2-3 (20-21).
Manzon M., Comparative Education: The Construction of a Field, Hong Kong 2011, Comparative Education Research Center. The University of Hong Kong, Springer.
Mattheou D., The Changing Educational Context and the Quest for a New Paradigm in Comparative Education, [in:] R. Cowen, A. M. Kazamias (eds.), International Handbook of Comparative Education. Part One, Dordrecht-Heidelberg-London-New York 2009, Springer.
Melnychenko B. F. and others (eds.), The National Education Systems in the Foreign Countries at the Modern Stage (capitalist and developing countries), K.: KHPY, 1990.
Novoa A., Comparative research in education: A mode of governance or a historical journey?, “Comparative Education Review”, 11/2003, 39(4).
Rust V.D., Johnstone B, Allaf C., Reflections on the Development of Comparative Education, [in:] R. Cowen, A. M. Kazamias (eds.), International Handbook of Comparative Education. Part One, Dordrecht-Heidelberg-London-New York 2009, Springer.
Sbruieva A., Comparative Education: teach. Guidance, Sumy 1999, SDPU.
Sweeting A., Doing Comparative Historical Education Research: problems and issues from and about Hong Kong, [in:] Keith Watson (ed.), Doing Comparative Historical Education Research: problems and issues, UK 2001, Symposium books.
Vasylyuk A., Korsak K., Yakovets N., Essays on Comparative Education, Nizhyn 2002, Publishing and Editorial Department of the SPU in Nizhyn.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/j.2016.29.2.7
Date of publication: 2017-06-28 10:55:49
Date of submission: 2016-07-04 18:52:01
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.