Standards of Psychological and Pedagogical Training of Teachers in Germany: Content and Discussions

Liudmyla Diachenko

Abstract


In the article, the standards of psychological and pedagogical training of teachers of general secondary education in Germany are considered. The following methods were used to achieve the goal of the study: general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, generalization), which were used to develop standards of psychological and pedagogical training of teachers; methods of structural and functional analysis, based on which insufficient reflection in the standards of all aspects of professional pedagogical activities were identified. The study found that the training of future teachers of general secondary education in German universities includes four blocks: 1) special-subject; 2) subject-didactic; 3) "Science of Education"; 4) professional and pedagogical practice. The special importance of the block "Science of Education" is emphasized, as it reflects the content of teachers’ psychological and pedagogical training. It was found that the standards of teacher training in the "Science of Education" block are formulated in view of the competencies that must be mastered by the future teacher for the effective implementation of professional and pedagogical activities. A number of conclusions have been reached: 1) implementation of the standards is the main tool for reforming professional pedagogical education in Germany at the beginning of the 21st century; 2) development of standards for the training of future teachers is carried out with a focus on results – the development of professional competencies, based on interdisciplinary knowledge and reflection on acquired experience; 3) the standards are a dynamic set of requirements for teacher training, which can be supplemented and changed depending on the socio-cultural conditions of professional pedagogical activity; 4) the standards are not aimed at the individual activities of a teacher, but at his holistic professional development, taking into account participation in school development; 5) the standards are a framework structure for further development of the curriculum and the formation of the content of modules of future teachers’ psychological and pedagogical training; 6) the key principles of structuring the content of psychological and pedagogical training of teachers of general secondary education in accordance with the above standards are the following: interdisciplinarity, modularity, reflectivity. We are convinced that the implementation of standards is positive for improving the quality of teacher training in Germany. At the same time, we believe that the approved standards do not reflect all aspects of professional pedagogical activity (civic and social competence, leadership skills).

 


Keywords


standards of teacher training; psychological and pedagogical training; sciences about education; curriculum; future teachers; general secondary education institution; the Federal Republic of Germany

Full Text:

PDF

References


LITERATURE

Bauer, K.-О. (2005). Pädagogische Basiskompetenzen. Theorie und Training. Weinheim: Juventa Verlag.

Baumert, J. (2011). Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften: Ergebnisse des Forschungsprogramms COACTIV. Münster: Waxmann Verlag.

Beck, K. (2006). Standards – ein Mittel zur Qualitätsentwicklung in der Lehrerbildung. Wirtschafts und Erziehung, 2, 44–45.

Brandenberg, M., Keller, B. (2002). Entwicklung von Standards. Methodisches Vorgehen und Praxiserfahrungen. Journal für Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung, 2(1), 61–69.

Ciblez, L. (2003). Standards und/oder Kerncurriculum für die Lehrerbildung? Zur Einführung in den Themenschwerpunkt. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 21(3), 329–333.

Fuchs, M., Zutavern, M. (2003). Standards als Mӧglichkeit zur Professionalisierung. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 21(3), 370–383.

Herzog, W. (2005). Müssen wir Standart wollen? Skepsis gegenüber einem theoretisch (zu) schwachen Konzept. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 51(2), 252–258.

Klieme, E., Leutner, D. (2006). Kompetenzmodelle zur Erfassung individueller Lernergebnisse und zur Bilanzierung von Bildungsprozessen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52(6), 876–903.

Lokshyna, O.I. (2009). Formation of the “competence” idea in European education. In Implementation of the European experience of the competence approach in the higher school of Ukraine: materials methodological seminar (pp. 19–33). Kyiv: Pedagogical Thought.

Mayr, J., Nieskens, B. (2013). Das Eignungspraktikum – engagierte Lehrkräfte gewinnen. Schule NRW, Januar, 40–44.

National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine. (2017). Curriculum for Professional Development of Pedagogical, Scientifi and Pedagogical Workers and Heads of Educational Institutions in the Field 01: Pedagogical Education. Kyiv: TsIPPO.

Nieke, W. (2006). Professionelle pädagogische Handlungskompetenz zwischen Qualifiation und Bildung. In M. Rapold (Ed.), Pädagogische Kompetenz, Identität und Professionalität (pp. 35–49). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohendehren.

Oelkers, J. (2003). Standards in der Lehrerbildung. Eine dringliche Aufgabe, die der Präzisierung bedarf. In D. Lemmermöhle, D. Jahreis (Eds.), Professionalisierung der Lehrerbildung, 7, 54–70.

Pukhovska, L.P. (2013). Standards of Pedagogical Education: Scientifi Discussion of Western Scientists. Taurian Bulletin of Education, 4(44), 10–18.

Reh, S. (2002). Die Begründung von Standards in der Lehrerbildung. Theoretische Perspektiven und Kritik. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 51(2), 259–265.

Schützenmeister, J. (2002). Professionalisierung und Polyvalenz in der Lehrerausbildung. Marburg: Tectum Verlag DE.

Terhart, E. (2000). Perspektiven der Lehrerbildung in Deutschland. Abschlußbericht der von der Kultusministerkonferenz eingesetzten Kommission. Weinheim: Beltz.

Terhart, E. (2005). Standards für die Lehrerbildung – ein Kommentar. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 51(2), 275–279.

White Paper on National Education (2009). White Paper on National Education “Forces of Change and Vectors of Movement for New Education in Ukraine”. Kyiv: MBF Ukraine 3000.

ONLINE SOURCES

Kultusministerkonferenz. (2000). Gemeinsame Erklärung des Präsidenten der Kultusministerkonferenz und der Vorsitzenden der Bildungs- und Lehrergewerkschaften sowie ihrer Spitzenorganisationen Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund DGB und DBB – Beamtenbund und Tarifunion (Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 5.10.2000). Retrieved from:

http://www.kmk.org/fieadmin/Dateien/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2000/2000_10_05-Aufgaben-Lehrer.pdf (access: 12.01.2022).

Kultusministerkonferenz. (2004, 2014). Standards für die Lehrerbildung: Bildungswissenschaften (Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 16.12.2004; 12.06.2014). Retrieved from: http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2004/2004_12_16StandardsLehrerbildung.pdf (access: 12.01.2022).

Lehmann, G., Nieke, W. (2000). Zum Kompetenz-Modell. Retrieved from: http://www.bildungsservermv.de/download/material/text-lehmann-nieke.pdf; https://bildungsserver.berlin-brandenburg.de/fileadmin/bbb/themen/Gesundheitsfoerderung/Suchtpraevention/Kompetenzmodell_

Lehmann-2.pdf (access: 15.03.2022).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/j.2022.35.2.235-245
Date of publication: 2022-09-05 09:51:10
Date of submission: 2022-02-15 11:34:08


Statistics


Total abstract view - 643
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 250

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.