OECD Instruments at the Intersection of Antitrust, Tax Policy, and Labour Law: Global Standards for Fair Markets
Abstract
In the era of rapid digital economy development, existing legal regulations, drafted before the intensification of this process, are increasingly proving inadequate to contemporary realities. Modern technologies enable the provision of most services remotely. Regulations that for many years governed the provision of local services were designed with business activities based on physical presence and limited territorial scope in mind. At the time when these regulations were developed, the rapid expansion of online services or the extensive scale of e-commerce could not have been anticipated. The profound transformation of business models adopted by a significant number of enterprises, including multinational corporations, has become a major challenge for legislators, who must adapt existing legal frameworks to the realities of a rapidly changing world. This process is particularly complex due to the risk of significant tax revenue losses for countries in which these enterprises, predominantly American corporations, are headquartered. Consequently, the regulations currently regulations in force may be regarded as outdated and insufficient for conducting business in the 21st century. This situation creates substantial systemic challenges and underscores the scale of the difficulties involved in developing unified global legal regulations. Their implementation would require international consensus that takes into account the interests of all states and encourages them to adopt and enforce common principles. The introduction of new regulations modifying taxation mechanisms also has a significant impact on market competition and labor law, as demonstrated in this article.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
LITERATURE
Areeda P., Hovenkamp H., Antitrust Law: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application, New York 2022.
Autor D., Dorn D., Lawrence F., Patterson C., Van Reenen J., The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms, “Quarterly Journal of Economics” 2020, vol. 135(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaa004
Avi-Yonah R., The International Tax Regime at 100: Reflections on the OECD’s BEPS Project, “University of Michigan Law & Economics Research Paper” 2021, no. 21-020.
Beer S., Mooij R. de, Liu L., International Corporate Tax Avoidance: A Review of the Channels, Magnitudes, and Blind Spots, “Journal of Economic Surveys” 2020, vol. 34(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12305
Brun L., Pycroft J., Speitmann R., Stasio A.L., Stöhlker D., The Impact of the Global Minimum Tax on Corporate Tax Revenues: Evidence for EU Member States, Seville 2025.
Cobham A., Janský P., Global Distribution of Revenue Loss from Tax Avoidance, “Journal of International Development” 2019, vol. 31(2).
Devereux M.P., Vella J., Implications of Digitalisation for International Corporate Tax Reform, “Fiscal Studies” 2018, vol. 39(4).
European Commission, Business Taxation for the 21st Century, Brussels 2021.
European Commission, Report on Competition Policy, Brussels 2020.
Fox E.M., Competition Policy and Tax Policy: A Symbiotic Relationship, “Antitrust Law Journal” 2020, vol. 84(1).
Fox E.M., Bakhoum M., Making Markets Work for Africa: Markets, Development, and Competition Law in Sub-Saharan Africa, New York 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190930998.001.0001
Gravelle J.G., Tax Havens: International Tax Avoidance and Evasion, CRS Report no. R40623, Washington 2021.
Jones A., Sufrin B., EU Competition Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, Oxford 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198723424.001.0001
Keen M., Konrad K.A., The Theory of International Tax Competition and Coordination, [in:] Handbook of Public Economics, eds. A.J. Auerbach, R. Chetty, M. Feldstein, J. Saez, vol. 5, Amsterdam 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53759-1.00005-4
Kovacic W.E., Shapiro C., Antitrust Policy: A Century of Economic and Legal Thinking, “Journal of Economic Perspectives” 2000, vol. 14(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.1.43
Mozgiel-Wiecha K., Nowe ramy podatku cyfrowego, “Annales UMCS sectio G (Ius)” 2022, vol. 68(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/g.2021.68.2.167-181
Naidu S., Posner E.A., Weyl G., Antitrust Remedies for Labor Market Power, “Harvard Law Review” 2018, vol. 132(2).
OECD, Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, Paris 2013.
OECD, Addressing the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy – Pillar One Blueprint, Paris 2021.
OECD, Economic Outlook 2023, Paris 2023.
OECD, Global Anti-Base Erosion Proposal (Pillar Two) – Rules, Paris 2021.
OECD, OECD Employment Outlook 2024, Paris 2024.
OECD, Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation – Report on Pillar One Blueprint: Inclusive Framework on BEPS, Paris 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/beba0634-en
OECD, Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation of the Economy – Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (Pillar Two): Inclusive Framework on BEPS, Paris 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/782bac33-en
OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS, Statement by the Co-Chairs of the Inclusive Framework on the Status of the Negotiations on Amount A and Amount B, Paris 2025.
Pogge T., Mehta K. (eds.), Global Tax Fairness, Oxford 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198725343.001.0001
Posner E.A., Weyl E.G., Radical Markets: Uprooting Capitalism and Democracy for a Just Society, Princeton 2018.
Stiglitz J.E., People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent, New York 2019.
Zucman G., Taxing across Borders: Tracking Personal Wealth and Corporate Profits, “Journal of Economic Perspectives” 2014, vol. 28(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.4.121
Zucman G., The Hidden Wealth of Nations: The Scourge of Tax Havens, Chicago 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226245560.001.0001
ONLINE SOURCES
European Commission, Antitrust: Commission Fines Google €2.42 Billion for Abusing Dominance as Search Engine by Giving Illegal Advantage to Own Comparison Shopping Service, 27.6.2017, https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-17-1785_en.htm (access: 2.8.2026).
European Commission, Antitrust: Commission Fines Google €4.34 Billion for Illegal Practices Regarding Android Mobile Devices to Strengthen Dominance of Google’s Search Engine, 18.7.2018, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_18_4581 (access: 2.8.2026).
International Labour Organization, World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2020, 2020, https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@dcomm/@publ/documents/publication/wcms_734455.pdf (access: 2.8.2026).
Ministerstwo Finansów, MF: wspieramy reformę międzynarodowego opodatkowania, 1.7.2021, https://www.gov.pl/web/finanse/mf-wspieramy-reforme-miedzynarodowego-opodatkowania (access: 2.8.2026).
OECD, Competition Policy and Labour Markets, 2021, https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/competition-policy-and-labour-markets.htm (access: 2.8.2026).
StatCounter, Search Engine Market Share Worldwide, 2024, https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share (access: 2.8.2026).
LEGAL ACTS
Council Directive (EU) 2022/2523 of 14 December 2022 on ensuring a global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union (OJ L 328/1, 22.12.2022).
CASE LAW
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 September 2022, Case T-604/18, Google LLC and Alphabet, Inc. v European Commission, ECLI:EU:T:2022:541.
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2024, Case C-48/22 P, Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v. European Commission, ECLI:EU:C:2024:726.
Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 19 June 2025, Case C-738/22 P, Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v European Commission, ECLI:EU:C:2025:463.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/g.2026.73.1.61-77
Date of publication: 2026-09-22 15:20:38
Date of submission: 2026-05-17 20:32:02
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.